Min Ju-Hong, Lee Yong-Seok
Department of Neurology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Korea.
J Neurol Sci. 2007 Sep 15;260(1-2):183-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
Evaluation of vertebral artery (VA) with transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) is difficult due to anatomical variations of hypoplasia (HP) or aplasia (AP). TCD findings of HP or AP of VA are rarely known. Comparing with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), we tried to evaluate characteristic findings of HP or AP of VA using TCD.
Consecutive healthy patients who underwent TCD and MRA were included. VA was classified as normal (NL), hypoplasia (HP), and aplasia (AP) according to MRA. TCD parameters of mean flow velocity (MFV), pulsatility index (PI), vertebral/basilar artery flow velocity ratio (VA/BA FVR), and asymmetry index (AI) of VA were compared between three groups.
Four hundred and ten patients were included, and 298 patients (72.7%) were classified as NL, 98 (23.9%) as HP and 14 (3.4%) as AP. MFV, PI and VA/BA FVR of ipsilateral VA were not different between groups. However, MFV of contralateral VA and AI were significantly increased in HP and AP groups (p<0.001). AI was significantly different between the three groups (17.7% and 30.5%, p<0.001). Sensitivity and specificity for HP or AP were 20.5% and 90.9%, if AI over 40% were adopted as diagnostic criteria.
MFV of VA should be interpreted with caution for its frequent anatomical variations. Increased MFV of unilateral VA may indicate not only as ipsilateral stenosis, but also as contralateral HP or AP. AI over 40% is specific to predict unilateral HP or AP with clinical correlation.
由于椎动脉(VA)发育不全(HP)或发育异常(AP)的解剖变异,经颅多普勒超声(TCD)对其进行评估较为困难。VA的HP或AP的TCD表现鲜为人知。与磁共振血管造影(MRA)相比,我们试图用TCD评估VA的HP或AP的特征性表现。
纳入连续接受TCD和MRA检查的健康患者。根据MRA将VA分为正常(NL)、发育不全(HP)和发育异常(AP)。比较三组之间VA的平均流速(MFV)、搏动指数(PI)、椎动脉/基底动脉流速比值(VA/BA FVR)和不对称指数(AI)等TCD参数。
共纳入410例患者,其中298例(72.7%)被分类为NL,98例(23.9%)为HP,14例(3.4%)为AP。同侧VA的MFV、PI和VA/BA FVR在各组之间无差异。然而,HP组和AP组对侧VA的MFV和AI显著升高(p<0.001)。三组之间的AI有显著差异(17.7%和30.5%,p<0.001)。如果采用AI超过40%作为诊断标准,HP或AP的敏感性和特异性分别为20.5%和90.9%。
由于VA频繁的解剖变异,对其MFV的解读应谨慎。单侧VA的MFV升高不仅可能提示同侧狭窄,也可能提示对侧HP或AP。AI超过40%对于预测单侧HP或AP具有临床相关性的特异性。