Wingard J R, Herbrecht R, Mauskopf J, Schlamm H T, Marciniak A, Roberts C S
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Transpl Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;9(3):182-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2007.00210.x. Epub 2007 Jul 1.
Voriconazole, a broad-spectrum triazole, has demonstrated significantly improved survival compared with conventional amphotericin B (CAB) as initial therapy for invasive aspergillosis (IA).
To compare health care resource use and cost at 12 weeks following first-line treatment with voriconazole compared with CAB for IA using resource use data collected during a clinical trial.
Days of hospitalization, intensive care, antifungal drug use, and outpatient care were collected during a large randomized, controlled trial of patients with IA receiving initial treatment with voriconazole or CAB. Unit costs based on published data sources were applied to healthcare use to estimate 12-week costs following initiation of therapy. Resource use and costs were compared for each treatment arm overall and by survival. The sensitivity of total costs to changes in healthcare use and unit costs was examined.
Total hospital days and intensive care unit (ICU) days were similar for voriconazole and CAB (total: 27.8 vs. 27.7, P=0.97 and ICU: 5.6 vs. 8.1, P=0.11). Among survivors, voriconazole was associated with similar numbers of total hospital days (29.8 vs. 32.0 days, P=0.54) to CAB, but fewer ICU days (3.9 vs. 8.2, P=0.03). For non-survivors, those treated with voriconazole had a similar number of total hospital days (23.0 vs. 21.8, P=0.73) and ICU days (9.8 vs. 7.9, P=0.44). Patients treated with voriconazole had significantly more days alive and out of the hospital than with CAB at 12 weeks (40.3 vs. 28.4 days, P<0.001). Total costs were similar with voriconazole compared with CAB ($78,860 vs. $83,857, P=0.51). Differences in cost were not sensitive to changes in the input parameter values.
Using voriconazole first-line for treatment of IA resulted in significantly fewer deaths and similar treatment costs. Hospital-free survival was significantly greater for patients initially treated with voriconazole.
伏立康唑是一种广谱三唑类药物,作为侵袭性曲霉病(IA)的初始治疗药物,与传统两性霉素B(CAB)相比,已显示出显著提高的生存率。
利用一项临床试验期间收集的资源使用数据,比较伏立康唑与CAB一线治疗IA后12周的医疗资源使用情况和成本。
在一项大型随机对照试验中,收集接受伏立康唑或CAB初始治疗的IA患者的住院天数、重症监护天数、抗真菌药物使用情况和门诊护理情况。根据已发表的数据源确定的单位成本应用于医疗保健使用情况,以估计治疗开始后12周的成本。比较了每个治疗组总体以及按生存率划分的资源使用情况和成本。研究了总成本对医疗保健使用情况和单位成本变化的敏感性。
伏立康唑和CAB的总住院天数和重症监护病房(ICU)天数相似(总计:27.8天对27.7天,P = 0.97;ICU:5.6天对8.1天,P = 0.11)。在幸存者中,伏立康唑的总住院天数与CAB相似(29.8天对32.0天,P = 0.54),但ICU天数较少(3.9天对8.2天,P = 0.03)。对于非幸存者,接受伏立康唑治疗的患者总住院天数(23.0天对21.8天,P = 0.73)和ICU天数(9.8天对7.9天,P = 0.44)相似。接受伏立康唑治疗的患者在12周时存活且出院的天数比接受CAB治疗的患者显著更多(40.3天对28.4天,P < 0.001)。与CAB相比,伏立康唑的总成本相似(78,860美元对83,857美元,P = 0.51)。成本差异对输入参数值的变化不敏感。
一线使用伏立康唑治疗IA导致死亡人数显著减少且治疗成本相似。初始接受伏立康唑治疗的患者无住院生存期显著更长。