Ramcharitar Steve, Gaster Anne Louise, Daemen Joost, Serruys Patrick
Thoraxcenter, GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Herz. 2007 Jun;32(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00059-007-2994-z.
Several meta-analyses have demonstrated the superiority of drug-eluting stents (DES) in reducing the incidence of restenosis, target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization compared to their predecessor, the bare-metal stent. In comparing Cypher and Taxus stents, the two most recent meta-analyses have given the edge to the Cypher. However, it must be stressed that the superiority of one DES over another remains debatable due to ever changing "real-world data" compared to those attained from randomized trials. The newer sirolimus analogs and selective inhibitors are challenging the old guard in their quest to further limit restenosis. So too are the newer "high-tech" polymers and additionally by using more biodegradable material in the stent's design. Stents aimed at targeting lesions are a new armament in the battle against restenosis and together with combination therapies are exciting key areas to watch. The ideal way to treat a DES in-stent restenosis is still a challenge and hence the impetus is to avoid it from happening in the first place.
多项荟萃分析表明,与裸金属支架(其前身)相比,药物洗脱支架(DES)在降低再狭窄、靶血管血运重建和靶病变血运重建发生率方面具有优势。在比较Cypher支架和Taxus支架时,最近的两项荟萃分析显示Cypher支架更具优势。然而,必须强调的是,与随机试验所获得的数据相比,由于“真实世界数据”不断变化,一种DES相对于另一种DES的优势仍存在争议。新型西罗莫司类似物和选择性抑制剂在进一步限制再狭窄的探索中正在挑战传统药物。新型“高科技”聚合物以及在支架设计中使用更多可生物降解材料也是如此。旨在靶向病变的支架是对抗再狭窄的新武器,与联合疗法一起是值得关注的令人兴奋的关键领域。治疗DES支架内再狭窄的理想方法仍然是一个挑战,因此,首要任务是避免其发生。