Fujita Eric M, Campbell David E, Arnott William P, Chow Judith C, Zielinska Barbara
Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89512, USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007 Jun;57(6):721-40. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.57.6.721.
The US. Department of Energy Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study was conducted to assess the sources of uncertainties in using an organic compound-based chemical mass balance receptor model to quantify the relative contributions of emissions from gasoline (or spark ignition [SI]) and diesel (or compression ignition [CI]) engines to ambient concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in California's South Coast Air Basin (SOCAB). In this study, several groups worked cooperatively on source and ambient sample collection and quality assurance aspects of the study but worked independently to perform chemical analysis and source apportionment. Ambient sampling included daily 24-hr PM2.5 samples at two air quality-monitoring stations, several regional urban locations, and along freeway routes and surface streets with varying proportions of automobile and truck traffic. Diesel exhaust was the dominant source of total carbon (TC) and elemental carbon (EC) at the Azusa and downtown Los Angeles, CA, monitoring sites, but samples from the central part of the air basin showed nearly equal apportionments of CI and SI. CI apportionments to TC were mainly dependent on EC, which was sensitive to the analytical method used. Weekday contributions of CI exhaust were higher for Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE; 41+/-3.7%) than Speciation Trends Network (32+/-2.4%). EC had little effect on SI apportionment. SI apportionments were most sensitive to higher molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (indeno[123-cd]pyrene, benzo(ghi)perylene, and coronene) and several steranes and hopanes, which were associated mainly with high emitters. Apportionments were also sensitive to choice of source profiles. CI contributions varied from 30% to 60% of TC when using individual source profiles rather than the composites used in the final apportionments. The apportionment of SI vehicles varied from 1% to 12% of TC depending on the specific profile that was used. Up to 70% of organic carbon (OC) in the ambient samples collected at the two fixed monitoring sites could not be apportioned to directly emitted PM emissions.
美国能源部开展了汽油/柴油颗粒物排放源解析研究,以评估使用基于有机化合物的化学质量平衡受体模型来量化加利福尼亚州南海岸空气盆地(SOCAB)中汽油(或火花点火[SI])和柴油(或压缩点火[CI])发动机排放对细颗粒物(PM2.5)环境浓度的相对贡献时不确定性的来源。在本研究中,几个团队在研究的源和环境样品采集以及质量保证方面进行了合作,但在进行化学分析和源解析时是独立工作的。环境采样包括在两个空气质量监测站、几个区域城市地点以及沿着高速公路路线和地面街道每日采集24小时的PM2.5样品,这些地方汽车和卡车交通比例各不相同。在加利福尼亚州阿祖萨和洛杉矶市中心的监测点,柴油尾气是总碳(TC)和元素碳(EC)的主要来源,但空气盆地中部的样品显示CI和SI的分配比例几乎相等。CI对TC的分配主要取决于EC,而EC对所使用的分析方法很敏感。在受保护视觉环境跨部门监测(IMPROVE;41±3.7%)中,CI尾气在工作日的贡献高于物种趋势网络(32±2.4%)。EC对SI分配影响很小。SI分配对较高分子量的多环芳烃(茚并[1,2,3-cd]芘、苯并[ghi]苝和晕苯)以及几种甾烷和藿烷最为敏感,这些主要与高排放源有关。分配也对源谱的选择敏感。使用单个源谱而非最终分配中使用的综合谱时,CI对TC的贡献在30%至60%之间变化。根据所使用的具体谱,SI车辆对TC的分配在1%至12%之间变化。在两个固定监测点采集的环境样品中,高达70%的有机碳(OC)无法分配到直接排放的PM排放源。