Suppr超能文献

使用视觉和电子识别设备对大规模养殖的伊比利亚猪从农场到屠宰场的可追溯性。

Traceability of extensively produced Iberian pigs using visual and electronic identification devices from farm to slaughter.

作者信息

Gosálvez L F, Santamarina C, Averós X, Hernández-Jover M, Caja G, Babot D

机构信息

Departament de Producció Animal, Universitat de Lleida. Avda. Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2007 Oct;85(10):2746-52. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0173. Epub 2007 Jul 3.

Abstract

A total of 351 Iberian pigs with equal numbers of both sexes from 2 commercial farms were used to study the ability of various identification devices to guarantee the traceability required for labeled meat products from Iberian pigs reared under extensive production conditions in Spain. The performance of tattoos, visual ear tags, electronic ear tags, and i.p.-injected transponders of half duplex and full duplex technologies were compared during a production cycle from nursery to slaughter at 15 mo of age (156 +/- 3 kg of BW). No major health reactions to any of the identification methods were detected. Results showed that tattooing was not an adequate identification procedure due to reading difficulties as a consequence of dark skin, soiled appearance, and figure deformation. Ear tag losses and failures were affected by fencing type and increased in one of the farms (20.4 and 15.7% for losses and failures, respectively; P < 0.05) as a consequence of using barbed-wire fences. Ear tag losses decreased when fences changed to stone blocks at 365 d of age. Visual and electronic ear tag losses during transport and slaughter were low (3.7% for visual and 3.1% for electronic tag). Results of injectable transponders during the growing-fattening period were variable and were more readable for the half duplex than for the full duplex i.p. transponders (92.0 vs. 68.7% +/- 1.5; P < 0.05). Handheld transceivers worked properly under extensive conditions, although the body size and skin characteristics of the Iberian breed might limit the performance of reading devices, and the use of transceivers with longer reading distances is recommended. The main problem observed with i.p. transponders was their low recovery rate at slaughter due to the lack of adherence of the transponders to the omentum.

摘要

来自2个商业农场的351头伊比利亚猪(雌雄数量相等)被用于研究各种识别设备保证西班牙粗放生产条件下饲养的伊比利亚猪带标签肉类产品所需可追溯性的能力。在从保育期到15月龄(体重156±3千克)屠宰的生产周期内,比较了纹身、可视耳标、电子耳标以及半双工和全双工技术的腹腔注射应答器的性能。未检测到对任何识别方法有重大健康反应。结果表明,由于深色皮肤、外观脏污和图案变形导致读取困难,纹身不是一种合适的识别方法。耳标丢失和故障受围栏类型影响,在其中一个农场中,由于使用带刺铁丝网围栏,耳标丢失和故障增加(分别为20.4%和15.7%;P<0.05)。在365日龄时将围栏更换为石块后,耳标丢失减少。运输和屠宰期间可视和电子耳标的丢失率较低(可视耳标为3.7%,电子耳标为3.1%)。生长育肥期腹腔注射应答器的结果各不相同,半双工腹腔注射应答器比全双工腹腔注射应答器更易读取(92.0%对68.7%±1.5;P<0.05)。手持式收发器在粗放条件下工作正常,尽管伊比利亚品种的体型和皮肤特征可能会限制读取设备的性能,建议使用读取距离更长的收发器。腹腔注射应答器观察到的主要问题是屠宰时回收率低,原因是应答器未附着在网膜上。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验