Meran Soma, Thomas David, Stephens Philip, Martin John, Bowen Timothy, Phillips Aled, Steadman Robert
Institute of Nephrology, School of Medicine, and Department of Oral Surgery, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, United Kingdom.
J Biol Chem. 2007 Aug 31;282(35):25687-97. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700773200. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
This study aimed to understand the role of the matrix polysaccharide, hyaluronan (HA), in influencing the scarring process by assessing its impact on regulating fibroblast behavior. Donor-matched human oral and dermal fibroblasts were used as models of nonscarring and scarring fibroblast phenotypes, respectively. Phenotypic differences in these two fibroblast populations were assessed and related to differences in HA synthesis and assembly. The two fibroblast populations showed intrinsic differences in their response to the profibrotic cytokine, transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGFbeta1), in that oral fibroblasts were resistant to TGFbeta1-driven myofibroblastic differentiation. In dermal fibroblasts, differentiation was associated with an induction of HA synthase (HAS1 and HAS2) transcription and assembly of pericellular HA coats. In comparison, resistance to differentiation in oral fibroblasts was associated with failure of induction of HAS1 and HAS2 transcription and failure of pericellular coat assembly. Furthermore, inhibition of HA synthesis in dermal fibroblasts significantly attenuated TGFbeta1-mediated differentiation. Interleukin-1beta stimulation resulted in induction of HAS1 and HAS2 transcription but did not induce phenotypic differentiation or induce HA coat assembly. In addition, neither overexpression nor down-regulation of HAS1 (the isoform uniquely deficient in nonscarring oral fibroblasts) influenced phenotypic differentiation. In conclusion, inhibiting HA synthesis modulates TGFbeta1-dependent responses in these cells preventing fibroblast to myofibroblast differentiation. Moreover, HA pericellular coat assembly, rather than HAS isoform expression, appears to be associated with phenotypic differentiation.
本研究旨在通过评估基质多糖透明质酸(HA)对成纤维细胞行为调节的影响,来了解其在瘢痕形成过程中的作用。供体匹配的人口腔成纤维细胞和皮肤成纤维细胞分别用作无瘢痕和成瘢痕成纤维细胞表型的模型。评估了这两种成纤维细胞群体的表型差异,并将其与HA合成和组装的差异相关联。这两种成纤维细胞群体对促纤维化细胞因子转化生长因子-β1(TGFβ1)的反应存在内在差异,即口腔成纤维细胞对TGFβ1驱动的肌成纤维细胞分化具有抗性。在皮肤成纤维细胞中,分化与HA合酶(HAS1和HAS2)转录的诱导以及细胞周围HA包被的组装有关。相比之下,口腔成纤维细胞对分化的抗性与HAS1和HAS2转录诱导的失败以及细胞周围包被组装的失败有关。此外,抑制皮肤成纤维细胞中的HA合成可显著减弱TGFβ1介导的分化。白细胞介素-1β刺激导致HAS1和HAS2转录的诱导,但未诱导表型分化或诱导HA包被组装。此外,HAS1(无瘢痕口腔成纤维细胞中唯一缺乏的异构体)的过表达或下调均不影响表型分化。总之,抑制HA合成可调节这些细胞中TGFβ1依赖性反应,防止成纤维细胞向肌成纤维细胞分化。此外,HA细胞周围包被的组装而非HAS异构体的表达似乎与表型分化有关。