Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2007 Jul 4;2(7):e594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000594.
Gene expression profiling has revolutionized our ability to molecularly classify primary human tumors and significantly enhanced the development of novel tumor markers and therapies; however, progress in the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma over the past 3 decades has been limited, and there is currently no approved therapy that significantly extends lifespan in patients with advanced disease. Profiling studies of melanoma to date have been inconsistent due to the heterogeneous nature of this malignancy and the limited availability of informative tissue specimens from early stages of disease.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: In order to gain an improved understanding of the molecular basis of melanoma progression, we have compared gene expression profiles from a series of melanoma cell lines representing discrete stages of malignant progression that recapitulate critical characteristics of the primary lesions from which they were derived. Here we describe the unsupervised hierarchical clustering of profiling data from melanoma cell lines and melanocytes. This clustering identifies two distinctive molecular subclasses of melanoma segregating aggressive metastatic tumor cell lines from less-aggressive primary tumor cell lines. Further analysis of expression signatures associated with melanoma progression using functional annotations categorized these transcripts into three classes of genes: 1) Upregulation of activators of cell cycle progression, DNA replication and repair (CDCA2, NCAPH, NCAPG, NCAPG2, PBK, NUSAP1, BIRC5, ESCO2, HELLS, MELK, GINS1, GINS4, RAD54L, TYMS, and DHFR), 2) Loss of genes associated with cellular adhesion and melanocyte differentiation (CDH3, CDH1, c-KIT, PAX3, CITED1/MSG-1, TYR, MELANA, MC1R, and OCA2), 3) Upregulation of genes associated with resistance to apoptosis (BIRC5/survivin). While these broad classes of transcripts have previously been implicated in the progression of melanoma and other malignancies, the specific genes identified within each class of transcripts are novel. In addition, the transcription factor NF-KB was specifically identified as being a potential "master regulator" of melanoma invasion since NF-KB binding sites were identified as consistent consensus sequences within promoters of progression-associated genes.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We conclude that tumor cell lines are a valuable resource for the early identification of gene signatures associated with malignant progression in tumors with significant heterogeneity like melanoma. We further conclude that the development of novel data reduction algorithms for analysis of microarray studies is critical to allow for optimized mining of important, clinically-relevant datasets. It is expected that subsequent validation studies in primary human tissues using such an approach will lead to more rapid translation of such studies to the identification of novel tumor biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
基因表达谱分析极大地提高了我们对人类原发性肿瘤进行分子分类的能力,并显著促进了新型肿瘤标志物和疗法的发展;然而,过去 30 年来,黑色素瘤的诊断和治疗进展有限,目前尚无批准的疗法能显著延长晚期患者的寿命。迄今为止,黑色素瘤的分析研究由于这种恶性肿瘤的异质性以及疾病早期缺乏信息性组织标本而不一致。
方法/主要发现:为了更好地了解黑色素瘤进展的分子基础,我们比较了一系列代表恶性进展不同阶段的黑色素瘤细胞系的基因表达谱,这些细胞系重现了它们衍生的原发性病变的关键特征。在这里,我们描述了从黑色素瘤细胞系和黑素细胞中获得的基因表达谱的无监督层次聚类。这种聚类将两个独特的黑色素瘤分子亚型分开,这些亚型将侵袭性转移性肿瘤细胞系与侵袭性较弱的原发性肿瘤细胞系分开。使用功能注释进一步分析与黑色素瘤进展相关的表达特征,将这些转录本分为三类基因:1)细胞周期进程、DNA 复制和修复的激活因子的上调(CDCA2、NCAPH、NCAPG、NCAPG2、PBK、NUSAP1、BIRC5、ESCO2、HELLS、MELK、GINS1、GINS4、RAD54L、TYMS 和 DHFR),2)与细胞黏附和黑素细胞分化相关基因的丢失(CDH3、CDH1、c-KIT、PAX3、CITED1/MSG-1、TYR、MELANA、MC1R 和 OCA2),3)与细胞凋亡抵抗相关基因的上调(BIRC5/survivin)。虽然这些广泛的转录本类别以前与黑色素瘤和其他恶性肿瘤的进展有关,但每个转录本类别中鉴定的特定基因是新的。此外,转录因子 NF-KB 被特别确定为黑色素瘤侵袭的潜在“主调节因子”,因为 NF-KB 结合位点被确定为与进展相关基因启动子中的一致共识序列。
结论/意义:我们的结论是,肿瘤细胞系是鉴定具有显著异质性的肿瘤(如黑色素瘤)中与恶性进展相关基因特征的早期有用资源。我们进一步得出结论,为分析微阵列研究开发新的数据简化算法对于优化挖掘重要的临床相关数据集至关重要。预计在原发性人类组织中使用这种方法进行后续验证研究将导致更快地将这些研究转化为鉴定新型肿瘤生物标志物和治疗靶点。