Suppr超能文献

邻苯二甲酸二乙酯、1,2 - 二氯乙烷和萘纯品及水溶液的皮肤渗透和滞后时间。

Skin penetration and lag times of neat and aqueous diethyl phthalate, 1,2-dichloroethane and naphthalene.

作者信息

Frasch H Frederick, Barbero Ana M, Alachkar Houda, McDougal James N

机构信息

Health Effects Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, USA.

出版信息

Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2007;26(2):147-60. doi: 10.1080/15569520701212274.

Abstract

Cutaneous exposures to occupational chemicals may cause toxic effects. For any chemical, the potential for systemic toxicity from dermal exposure depends on its ability to penetrate the skin. Most laboratory studies measure chemical penetration from an aqueous solution through isolated human or laboratory animal skin, although most exposures are not from pure aqueous solutions. The US EPA Interagency Testing Committee (ITC) mandated by the Toxic Substances Control Act, has required industry to measure the in vitro penetration of 34 chemicals in their pure or neat form (if liquid). The goal of the present study was to measure skin permeability and lag time for three neat chemicals of industrial importance, representing the general types of chemicals to be studied by the ITC (non-volatile liquids, volatile liquids, and solids), and to examine interlaboratory variation from these studies. Steady state fluxes and lag times of diethyl phthalate (DEP, slightly volatile), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE, highly volatile), and naphthalene (NAP, solid) were studied in two different laboratories using different analytical methods. One lab also measured fluxes and lag times from saturated aqueous vehicle. Static diffusion cells, dermatomed hairless guinea pig skin, and gas chromatography were used to measure skin penetration. In the two laboratories, the steady state fluxes (mean+/-SD; microg cm(-2)hour(-1)) of DEP applied neat were: 11.8+/-4.1 and 23.9+/-7.0; fluxes of DCE (neat) were 6280+/-1380 and 3842+/-712; fluxes of NAP from powder were 30.4+/-2.0 and 7.5+/-4.7. Compared with neat fluxes measured in the same laboratory, flux from saturated aqueous solution was higher with DEP (1.9 x) but lower with DCE (0.17 x) and NAP (0.45 x). The three chemicals studied including a dry powder, demonstrate the potential for significant dermal penetration.

摘要

皮肤接触职业性化学物质可能会导致中毒效应。对于任何化学物质而言,经皮肤接触产生全身毒性的可能性取决于其穿透皮肤的能力。大多数实验室研究是测量化学物质从水溶液透过离体的人体或实验动物皮肤的渗透情况,尽管大多数接触并非来自纯水溶液。美国环境保护局(EPA)依据《有毒物质控制法》设立的跨部门测试委员会(ITC)要求工业界测量34种纯净或纯态(如果是液体)化学物质的体外渗透情况。本研究的目的是测量三种具有工业重要性的纯态化学物质的皮肤渗透性和滞后时间,这三种化学物质代表了ITC要研究的化学物质的一般类型(非挥发性液体、挥发性液体和固体),并检验这些研究中的实验室间差异。使用不同的分析方法,在两个不同的实验室中研究了邻苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP,微挥发性)、1,2 - 二氯乙烷(DCE,高挥发性)和萘(NAP, 固体)的稳态通量和滞后时间。一个实验室还测量了来自饱和水性载体的通量和滞后时间。使用静态扩散池、去毛的无毛豚鼠皮肤和气相色谱法来测量皮肤渗透情况。在这两个实验室中,纯态施用的DEP的稳态通量(平均值±标准差;微克·厘米⁻²·小时⁻¹)分别为:11.8±4.1和23.9±7.0;DCE(纯态)的通量分别为6280±1380和3842±712;粉末状NAP的通量分别为30.4±2.0和7.5±4.7。与在同一实验室中测量的纯态通量相比,饱和水溶液的通量对于DEP更高(1.9倍),但对于DCE更低(0.17倍),对于NAP更低(0.45倍)。所研究的这三种化学物质,包括一种干粉,表明了显著的皮肤渗透潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验