Suppr超能文献

特邀评论:费威尔及其同事——引发辩论的素材

Invited commentary: Fewell and colleagues--fuel for debate.

作者信息

Marshall James

机构信息

Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Sep 15;166(6):656-8; discussion 659-61. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm173. Epub 2007 Jul 5.

Abstract

Concern over the impact of flawed measurement continues to nag epidemiology. Early studies indicated that the impact of measurement error is benign, leading generally only to attenuation of associations; more recent research has documented that this impact, especially within the setting of multivariate modeling, cannot be expected always to be benign. It can, for example, be a source of unsettling inconsistency. Fewell and colleagues (Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:646-655) show that residual confounding is especially persistent in the presence of multivariate confounding.

摘要

对有缺陷测量的影响的担忧一直困扰着流行病学领域。早期研究表明,测量误差的影响是良性的,通常只会导致关联减弱;最近的研究表明,这种影响,尤其是在多变量建模的情况下,并不总是良性的。例如,它可能是令人不安的不一致性的一个来源。Fewell及其同事(《美国流行病学杂志》2007年;166:646 - 655)表明,在存在多变量混杂因素的情况下,残余混杂尤其持久。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验