Wicker Sabine, Jung Juliane, Allwinn Regina, Gottschalk René, Rabenau Holger F
Occupational Health Service, Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University of Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 Jan;81(3):347-54. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0219-7. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
Health care workers (HCWs) are exposed to bloodborne pathogens, especially hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) through job-related risk factors like needlestick, stab, scratch, cut, or other bloody injuries. Needlestick injuries can be prevented by safer devices.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and causes of needlestick injuries in a German university hospital. Data were obtained by an anonymous, self-reporting questionnaire. We calculated the share of reported needlestick injuries, which could have been prevented by using safety devices.
31.4% (n = 226) of participant HCWs had sustained at least one needlestick injury in the last 12 months. A wide variation in the number of reported needlestick injuries was evident across disciplines, ranging from 46.9% (n = 91/194) among medical staff in surgery and 18.7% (n = 53/283) among HCWs in pediatrics. Of all occupational groups, physicians have the highest risk to experience needlestick injuries (55.1%-n = 129/234). Evaluating the kind of activity under which the needlestick injury occurred, on average 34% (n = 191/561) of all needlestick injuries could have been avoided by the use of safety devices. Taking all medical disciplines and procedures into consideration, safety devices are available for 35.1% (n = 197/561) of needlestick injuries sustained. However, there was a significant difference across various medical disciplines in the share of needlestick injuries which might have been avoidable: Pediatrics (83.7%), gynecology (83.7%), anesthesia (59.3%), dermatology (33.3%), and surgery (11.9%). In our study, only 13.2% (n = 74/561) of needlestick injuries could have been prevented by organizational measures.
There is a high rate of needlestick injuries in the daily routine of a hospital. The rate of such injuries depends on the medical discipline. Implementation of safety devices will lead to an improvement in medical staff's health and safety.
医护人员通过针刺、刺伤、划伤、割伤或其他出血性损伤等与工作相关的风险因素接触血源性病原体,尤其是乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)。使用更安全的设备可预防针刺伤。
本研究旨在调查德国一家大学医院针刺伤的发生频率及原因。通过匿名自填问卷获取数据。我们计算了使用安全设备本可预防的报告针刺伤的比例。
31.4%(n = 226)的参与医护人员在过去12个月中至少遭受过一次针刺伤。各学科报告的针刺伤数量差异很大,外科医务人员中为46.9%(n = 91/194),儿科医护人员中为18.7%(n = 53/283)。在所有职业群体中,医生遭受针刺伤的风险最高(55.1% - n = 129/234)。评估针刺伤发生时的活动类型,平均34%(n = 191/561)的针刺伤可通过使用安全设备避免。综合考虑所有医学学科和操作,35.1%(n = 197/561)的针刺伤有可用的安全设备。然而,不同医学学科中可能避免的针刺伤比例存在显著差异:儿科(83.7%)、妇科(83.7%)、麻醉科(59.3%)、皮肤科(33.3%)和外科(11.9%)。在我们的研究中,仅13.2%(n = 74/561)的针刺伤可通过组织措施预防。
医院日常工作中针刺伤发生率很高。此类损伤的发生率取决于医学学科。使用安全设备将改善医务人员的健康和安全状况。