Timberlake William, Sinning Susan A, Leffel Joseph K
Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jul;33(3):225-43. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.3.225.
In Stage 1 of 4 experiments in which rats completed a water-maze blocking procedure, experimental groups were trained to use a predictive beacon (hanging above, connected to, or displaced from the platform) to find a submerged escape platform in the presence of predictive or irrelevant background cues and in the presence or absence of irrelevant landmarks. In Stage 2, a fixed beacon, landmarks, and background cues all predicted the platform location. A Room Test (landmarks and background cues only) showed that Stage 1 training with a fixed hanging beacon or the moving displaced beacon facilitated Stage 2 learning of predictive room cues for experimental relative to control subjects. In contrast, Stage 1 training with a moving pole beacon interfered with Stage 2 learning about predictive room cues relative to controls, whereas training with a fixed pole or moving hanging beacon had no effect. We conclude that multiple spatial learning processes influence locating an escape platform in the water maze.
在大鼠完成水迷宫阻断程序的4个实验的第1阶段,实验组接受训练,利用一个预测信标(悬挂在平台上方、与平台相连或与平台错位),在存在预测性或无关背景线索以及存在或不存在无关地标物的情况下找到水下逃生平台。在第2阶段,一个固定信标、地标物和背景线索都能预测平台位置。一项房间测试(仅地标物和背景线索)表明,相对于对照受试者,在第1阶段使用固定悬挂信标或移动错位信标进行训练,有助于实验组在第2阶段学习预测性房间线索。相比之下,相对于对照组,在第1阶段使用移动杆状信标进行训练会干扰第2阶段对预测性房间线索的学习,而使用固定杆状信标或移动悬挂信标进行训练则没有效果。我们得出结论,多种空间学习过程会影响在水迷宫中定位逃生平台。