Sundberg Tobias, Halpin Jeremy, Warenmark Anders, Falkenberg Torkel
Unit for Studies of Integrative Health Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet 23300, Huddinge, Sweden.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 10;7:107. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-107.
Collaboration between providers of conventional care and complementary therapies (CTs) has gained in popularity but there is a lack of conceptualised models for delivering such care, i.e. integrative medicine (IM). The aim of this paper is to describe some key findings relevant to the development and implementation of a proposed model for IM adapted to Swedish primary care.
Investigative procedures involved research group and key informant meetings with multiple stakeholders including general practitioners, CT providers, medical specialists, primary care administrators and county council representatives. Data collection included meeting notes which were fed back within the research group and used as ongoing working documents. Data analysis was made by immersion/crystallisation and research group consensus. Results were categorised within a public health systems framework of structures, processes and outcomes.
The outcome was an IM model that aimed for a patient-centered, interdisciplinary, non-hierarchical mix of conventional and complementary medical solutions to individual case management of patients with pain in the lower back and/or neck. The IM model case management adhered to standard clinical practice including active partnership between a gate-keeping general practitioner, collaborating with a team of CT providers in a consensus case conference model of care. CTs with an emerging evidence base included Swedish massage therapy, manual therapy/naprapathy, shiatsu, acupuncture and qigong.
Despite identified barriers such as no formal recognition of CT professions in Sweden, it was possible to develop a model for IM adapted to Swedish primary care. The IM model calls for testing and refinement in a pragmatic randomised controlled trial to explore its clinical effectiveness.
传统医疗服务提供者与补充疗法(CTs)之间的合作日益普遍,但缺乏提供此类医疗服务的概念化模式,即整合医学(IM)。本文旨在描述一些与适用于瑞典初级医疗保健的整合医学拟议模式的开发与实施相关的关键发现。
调查程序包括与包括全科医生、补充疗法提供者、医学专家、初级医疗保健管理人员和郡议会代表在内的多个利益相关者举行研究小组会议和关键信息提供者会议。数据收集包括会议记录,这些记录在研究小组内部反馈并用作持续的工作文件。数据分析通过沉浸/结晶法和研究小组达成共识进行。结果在公共卫生系统的结构、过程和结果框架内进行分类。
成果是一个整合医学模式,旨在以患者为中心,采用跨学科、非等级制的方式,将传统和补充医学解决方案结合起来,用于对下背部和/或颈部疼痛患者进行个案管理。整合医学模式的个案管理遵循标准临床实践,包括把关全科医生与补充疗法提供者团队在共识个案会议护理模式下积极合作。有新证据基础的补充疗法包括瑞典按摩疗法、手法治疗/推拿疗法、指压疗法、针灸和气功。
尽管存在一些障碍,如瑞典对补充疗法专业没有正式认可,但仍有可能开发出适用于瑞典初级医疗保健的整合医学模式。该整合医学模式需要在务实的随机对照试验中进行测试和完善,以探索其临床效果。