Mougiakakou Stavroula G, Valavanis Ioannis K, Nikita Alexandra, Nikita Konstantina S
National Technical University of Athens, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Biomedical Simulations and Imaging Laboratory, 9 Heroon Polytechneiou Str., 15780 Zografou, Athens, Greece.
Artif Intell Med. 2007 Sep;41(1):25-37. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
The aim of the present study is to define an optimally performing computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) architecture for the classification of liver tissue from non-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images into normal liver (C1), hepatic cyst (C2), hemangioma (C3), and hepatocellular carcinoma (C4). To this end, various CAD architectures, based on texture features and ensembles of classifiers (ECs), are comparatively assessed.
Number of regions of interests (ROIs) corresponding to C1-C4 have been defined by experienced radiologists in non-enhanced liver CT images. For each ROI, five distinct sets of texture features were extracted using first order statistics, spatial gray level dependence matrix, gray level difference method, Laws' texture energy measures, and fractal dimension measurements. Two different ECs were constructed and compared. The first one consists of five multilayer perceptron neural networks (NNs), each using as input one of the computed texture feature sets or its reduced version after genetic algorithm-based feature selection. The second EC comprised five different primary classifiers, namely one multilayer perceptron NN, one probabilistic NN, and three k-nearest neighbor classifiers, each fed with the combination of the five texture feature sets or their reduced versions. The final decision of each EC was extracted by using appropriate voting schemes, while bootstrap re-sampling was utilized in order to estimate the generalization ability of the CAD architectures based on the available relatively small-sized data set.
The best mean classification accuracy (84.96%) is achieved by the second EC using a fused feature set, and the weighted voting scheme. The fused feature set was obtained after appropriate feature selection applied to specific subsets of the original feature set.
The comparative assessment of the various CAD architectures shows that combining three types of classifiers with a voting scheme, fed with identical feature sets obtained after appropriate feature selection and fusion, may result in an accurate system able to assist differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions from non-enhanced CT images.
本研究的目的是定义一种性能最优的计算机辅助诊断(CAD)架构,用于将非增强计算机断层扫描(CT)图像中的肝组织分类为正常肝脏(C1)、肝囊肿(C2)、血管瘤(C3)和肝细胞癌(C4)。为此,对基于纹理特征和分类器集成(EC)的各种CAD架构进行了比较评估。
经验丰富的放射科医生在非增强肝脏CT图像中定义了与C1 - C4相对应的感兴趣区域(ROI)数量。对于每个ROI,使用一阶统计量、空间灰度依赖矩阵、灰度差分法、Laws纹理能量度量和分形维测量提取了五组不同的纹理特征。构建并比较了两种不同的EC。第一种由五个多层感知器神经网络(NN)组成,每个网络将计算出的纹理特征集之一或基于遗传算法的特征选择后的简化版本作为输入。第二种EC由五个不同的初级分类器组成,即一个多层感知器NN、一个概率NN和三个k近邻分类器,每个分类器都输入五个纹理特征集或其简化版本的组合。每个EC的最终决策通过使用适当的投票方案提取,同时利用自助重采样来基于可用的相对较小数据集估计CAD架构的泛化能力。
第二种EC使用融合特征集和加权投票方案实现了最佳平均分类准确率(84.96%)。融合特征集是在对原始特征集的特定子集应用适当的特征选择后获得的。
对各种CAD架构的比较评估表明,将三种类型的分类器与投票方案相结合,输入经过适当特征选择和融合后获得的相同特征集,可能会产生一个准确的系统,能够辅助从非增强CT图像中对肝脏局灶性病变进行鉴别诊断。