Suppr超能文献

体重指数、前列腺重量及经直肠超声测定前列腺体积的准确性。

Body mass index, prostate weight and transrectal ultrasound prostate volume accuracy.

作者信息

Sajadi Kamran P, Terris Martha K, Hamilton Robert J, Cullen Jennifer, Amling Christopher L, Kane Christopher J, Presti Joseph C, Aronson William J, Freedland Stephen J

机构信息

Augusta Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):990-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.049. Epub 2007 Jul 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Transrectal ultrasound can be used to calculate prostate volume, which has implications for benign and malignant prostate disease. We hypothesized that obesity may represent a technical challenge when performing transrectal ultrasound that decreases the accuracy of estimating prostate volume.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the records of men with previously untreated prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1995 and 2006 and who were in the Shared-Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database. Transrectal ultrasound volume calculations were correlated with radical prostatectomy specimen weight using the Spearman coefficient. We calculated the percent and absolute error, and evaluated the relationship between them and transrectal ultrasound volume, body mass index, age, prostate specific antigen and race using multivariate linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 497 patients with preoperative transrectal ultrasound volume, specimen weight and body mass index data were identified in the Shared-Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database. Transrectal ultrasound volume correlated modestly with specimen weights (r = 0.692, p <0.001). The median +/- SD absolute error was 9.6 +/- 11.4 gm and the median +/- SD percent error was 22.9% +/- 20.6%. Body mass index was not significantly related to absolute or percent error (p = 0.91 and 0.71, respectively). In addition, patient age, prostate specific antigen and race were not significantly related to absolute or percent error (p >0.05). However, percent error but not absolute error was significantly predicted by transrectal ultrasound volume (p <0.001 and 0.34, respectively). Smaller prostate size was associated with greater percent error, especially when transrectal ultrasound volume was less than 20 cc.

CONCLUSIONS

Transrectal ultrasound volume correlates with specimen weight but it is an imperfect substitute with significant variation in error. The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound depends on measured volume but neither body mass index nor other patient specific variables had a significant impact.

摘要

目的

经直肠超声可用于计算前列腺体积,这对前列腺良性和恶性疾病均有意义。我们推测,肥胖可能给经直肠超声检查带来技术挑战,从而降低前列腺体积估计的准确性。

材料与方法

我们查阅了1995年至2006年间在共享平等准入区域癌症医院数据库中接受根治性前列腺切除术且此前未接受过治疗的前列腺癌男性患者的记录。使用Spearman系数将经直肠超声体积计算结果与根治性前列腺切除标本重量进行关联。我们计算了百分比误差和绝对误差,并使用多元线性回归评估它们与经直肠超声体积、体重指数、年龄、前列腺特异性抗原和种族之间的关系。

结果

在共享平等准入区域癌症医院数据库中,共识别出497例有术前经直肠超声体积、标本重量和体重指数数据的患者。经直肠超声体积与标本重量呈中等程度相关(r = 0.692,p <0.001)。绝对误差的中位数±标准差为9.6±11.4克,百分比误差的中位数±标准差为22.9%±20.6%。体重指数与绝对误差或百分比误差均无显著相关性(p分别为0.91和0.71)。此外,患者年龄、前列腺特异性抗原和种族与绝对误差或百分比误差均无显著相关性(p>0.05)。然而,经直肠超声体积可显著预测百分比误差,但不能预测绝对误差(p分别<0.001和0.34)。前列腺体积越小,百分比误差越大,尤其是当经直肠超声体积小于20立方厘米时。

结论

经直肠超声体积与标本重量相关,但它是一种不完美的替代方法,误差存在显著差异。经直肠超声的准确性取决于测量的体积,但体重指数和其他患者特定变量均未产生显著影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验