Suppr超能文献

造林、毁林和绿化对土壤碳储存的影响。

Effects of reforestation, deforestation, and afforestation on carbon storage in soils.

作者信息

Czimczik Claudia I, Mund Martina, Schulze Ernst-Detlef, Wirth Christian

机构信息

Department of Earth System Science, University of Califoronia, Irvine, USA.

出版信息

SEB Exp Biol Ser. 2005:319-30.

Abstract

This study reviews the effects of changes in land use and land management on SOC pools in forest soils. In the 1990s, deforestation remained the most important land-use change in tropical regions (-142 x 10(6) ha per year). In non-tropical regions the forested area increased in developed countries as a result of natural reforestation (+26 x 10(6) ha per year). Deforestation also continued in under-developed countries in temperate regions. Without intensive site preparation, harvest followed by natural regeneration or reforestation has little impact on SOC pools in the mineral topsoil (0-0.3 m). Intensive site preparation results in losses of 6-13% of the initial SOC from the topsoil in the first decades. On average, deforestation followed by conversion to cropland results in SOC losses of 42% (or 0.1-1500 g (C) m(-2)) from the mineral topsoil, whereas conversion to pasture results in gains of 8%. The largest changes in SOC storage occur within the first two decades. After reforestation, SOC accumulation depends on the kind of managed forest established. Under productive deciduous reforestation (excluding eucalypts), SOC in the mineral topsoil accumulates at a rate of 20-50 g (C) m(-2) per year, and SOC pools could recover from cultivation-induced losses within 40 years. Under coniferous reforestation, the rate of accumulation of carbon is highest (95 g (C) m(-2) per year) in the organic layer, which is very susceptible to site preparation practices. In the mineral topsoil, the rate of accumulation is much lower (4 g (C) m(-2) per year), and recovery of the initial SOC pools might take several hundred years. The resulting land-use 'memory effect' has introduced large variation of the SOC pools in contemporary carbon budget studies. Thus, there seems to be a large temporal asymmetry between the period of time over which depletion of SOC occurs and the time needed for recovery of the SOC pools in the mineral soil. This should be taken into account when considering land-use and land-management activities to decrease atmospheric CO2 concentrations over this century.

摘要

本研究回顾了土地利用和土地管理变化对森林土壤中土壤有机碳库的影响。在20世纪90年代,森林砍伐仍是热带地区最重要的土地利用变化(每年-142×10⁶公顷)。在非热带地区,由于自然重新造林,发达国家的森林面积有所增加(每年+26×10⁶公顷)。温带地区的欠发达国家也继续存在森林砍伐现象。在没有进行集约整地的情况下,采伐后进行自然更新或重新造林对矿质表土(0-0.3米)中的土壤有机碳库影响很小。集约整地在最初几十年会导致表土中初始土壤有机碳损失6%-13%。平均而言,森林砍伐后转为农田会导致矿质表土中土壤有机碳损失42%(或0.1-1500克碳/平方米),而转为牧场则会使土壤有机碳增加8%。土壤有机碳储量的最大变化发生在前二十年。重新造林后,土壤有机碳的积累取决于所建立的经营森林类型。在高产落叶林重新造林(不包括桉树)的情况下,矿质表土中的土壤有机碳以每年20-50克碳/平方米的速度积累,土壤有机碳库可在40年内从耕种引起的损失中恢复。在针叶林重新造林的情况下,有机层中碳的积累速率最高(每年95克碳/平方米),而有机层极易受到整地措施的影响。在矿质表土中,积累速率要低得多(每年4克碳/平方米),初始土壤有机碳库的恢复可能需要数百年时间。由此产生的土地利用“记忆效应”在当代碳预算研究中导致了土壤有机碳库的巨大差异。因此,在土壤有机碳消耗发生的时间段与矿质土壤中土壤有机碳库恢复所需时间之间似乎存在很大的时间不对称性。在考虑本世纪为降低大气二氧化碳浓度而进行的土地利用和土地管理活动时,应考虑到这一点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验