Alexander H R, Hanna N, Pingpank J F
Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Cancer Treat Res. 2007;134:343-55. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-48993-3_22.
Taken together, these reports provide very provocative and encouraging data that have prompted some to conclude that cytoreduction and HIPEC represents a "new standard of care" for patients with MPM [26]. Certainly, for selected patients who have good performance status (low operative risk) and in whom complete or near complete cytoreduction can be achieved, this form of therapy is associated with a very notable overall survival ranging from 67 to 92 months in 2 larger series. Patient selection remains the central criteria for successful outcome. Patients should be carefully evaluated for co-morbid illnesses that would make them an unacceptable operative risk. Subsequently, CT scan and possibly laparoscopy should be performed to assess resectability with the appreciation that patients with suboptimal resection do very poorly. Pre-operative assessment of disease resectability is difficult to ascertain but some useful information can be obtained from a careful review of the CT scan; some investigators have advocated routine laparoscopy. Technically, details of HIPEC vary from center to center to some degree with respect to type of chemotherapy, dose of chemotherapy, duration of HIPEC, degree of hyperthermia, and method of recirculating the chemotherapy using either the open or closed technique. The use of the HIPEC technique, however, is considered the optimal method of ensuring complete distribution of therapeutic agents to the peritoneal cavity. Hyperthermia is routinely used for its synergistic actions with chemotherapy and its direct tumoricidal activity in experimental models. However, the therapeutic contribution of HIPEC above the effects of successful cytoreduction cannot be determined with available data although palliation of ascites is observed with HIPEC even without cytoreduction. There are no data indicating that one intra-operative chemotherapy regimen is superior to any other. The centers that report use of prolonged induction or post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy do not appear to have superior outcomes to those centers that use a more simple treatment regimen. Finally, although the intensity of therapy is considerable, once recovered, the patients appear to enjoy a good HRQOL. Although not specific for patients with MPM, 2 reports have convincingly demonstrated that HRQOL is significantly improved after HIPEC.
综合来看,这些报告提供了非常具有启发性和鼓舞性的数据,促使一些人得出结论,细胞减灭术和腹腔内热灌注化疗(HIPEC)代表了恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)患者的“新治疗标准”[26]。当然,对于特定的、身体状况良好(手术风险低)且能够实现完全或接近完全细胞减灭的患者,这种治疗方式在2个较大的系列研究中显示出非常显著的总生存期,范围为67至92个月。患者选择仍然是成功治疗结果的核心标准。应仔细评估患者是否存在会使其成为不可接受的手术风险的合并症。随后,应进行CT扫描,可能还需进行腹腔镜检查,以评估可切除性,因为认识到切除不充分的患者预后很差。术前评估疾病的可切除性很难确定,但通过仔细查看CT扫描可以获得一些有用信息;一些研究者主张常规进行腹腔镜检查。从技术上讲,HIPEC的细节在不同中心在某种程度上有所不同,涉及化疗类型、化疗剂量、HIPEC持续时间、热疗程度以及使用开放或封闭技术循环化疗的方法。然而,使用HIPEC技术被认为是确保治疗药物完全分布到腹腔的最佳方法。热疗因其在实验模型中与化疗的协同作用及其直接的杀肿瘤活性而被常规使用。然而,尽管在没有细胞减灭的情况下HIPEC也能观察到腹水减轻,但现有数据无法确定HIPEC在成功细胞减灭效果之上的治疗贡献。没有数据表明一种术中化疗方案优于其他方案。报告使用延长诱导或术后腹腔内化疗的中心似乎并没有比使用更简单治疗方案的中心有更好的结果。最后,尽管治疗强度相当大,但一旦康复,患者似乎享有良好的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。虽然并非专门针对MPM患者,但有2份报告令人信服地证明,HIPEC后HRQOL有显著改善。