Yanaga Yumi, Awai Kazuo, Nakayama Yoshiharu, Nakaura Takeshi, Tamura Yoshitaka, Funama Yoshinori, Aoyama Masahito, Asada Naoki, Yamashita Yasuyuki
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1-1-1 Honjyo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Radiat Med. 2007 Jul;25(6):278-88. doi: 10.1007/s11604-007-0138-2. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal dose and injection duration of contrast material (CM) for depicting hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) during the hepatic arterial phase with multidetector row computed tomography (CT).
The study population consisted of 71 patients with hypervascular HCCs. After unenhanced scans, the first (early arterial phase, or EAP), second (late arterial phase, or LAP), and third (equilibrium phase) scanning was started at 30, 43, and 180 s after injection of contrast material (CM). During a 33-s period, patients with a body weight < or =50 kg received 100 ml of non-ionic CM with an iodine concentration of 300 mg I/ml; patients whose body weight was >50 kg received 100 ml of CM with an iodine concentration of 370 mg I/ml. First, we measured enhancement in the abdominal aorta and tumor-to-liver contrast (TLC) during the EAP and LAP. Next, to investigate the relation between aortic enhancement and TLC during the LAP, two radiologists visually assessed the conspicuity of hypervascular HCCs during the LAP using a 3-point scale: grade 1, poor; grade 2, fair; grade 3, excellent. Finally, to examine the effect of the CM dose and injection duration on aortic enhancement during the EAP, we simulated aortic enhancement curves using test bolus data obtained for 10 HCC patients and the method of Fleischmann and Hittmair.
A relatively strong correlation was observed between aortic enhancement during the EAP and TLC during the LAP (correlation coefficient r = 0.75, P < 0.001). The 95% confidence intervals for the population mean for aortic enhancement during EAP in patients with tumor conspicuity grades of 1, 2, and 3 were 188.5, 222.4; 228.8, 259.3; and 280.2, 322.5 HU (Hounsfield Unit), respectively. Thus, we considered the lower limit of the aortic enhancement value for excellent depiction of HCCs during EAP to be 280 HU. To achieve an aortic enhancement value of >280 HU for aortic enhancement simulations during EAP, the injection duration should be <25 s for patients receiving a CM dose of 1.7 ml/kg with 300 mg I/ml iodine and <30 s for those receiving 2.0 ml/kg.
For excellent depiction of hypervascular HCCs during the hepatic arterial phase, the injection duration should be <25 s in patients receiving a CM dose of 1.7 ml/kg with 300 mg I/ml iodine and <30 s for patients receiving 2.0 ml/kg.
本研究旨在探讨在多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)肝动脉期显示富血供肝细胞癌(HCC)时对比剂(CM)的最佳剂量和注射持续时间。
研究对象为71例富血供HCC患者。平扫后,在注射对比剂(CM)后30、43和180秒开始进行首次(动脉早期,或EAP)、第二次(动脉晚期,或LAP)和第三次(平衡期)扫描。在33秒内,体重≤50 kg的患者接受100 ml碘浓度为300 mg I/ml的非离子型CM;体重>50 kg的患者接受100 ml碘浓度为370 mg I/ml的CM。首先,我们测量了EAP和LAP期间腹主动脉的强化程度以及肿瘤与肝脏的对比(TLC)。接下来,为了研究LAP期间主动脉强化与TLC之间的关系,两名放射科医生使用3分制对LAP期间富血供HCC的显影程度进行视觉评估:1级,差;2级,一般;3级,优秀。最后,为了检查CM剂量和注射持续时间对EAP期间主动脉强化的影响,我们使用为10例HCC患者获得的测试团注数据以及Fleischmann和Hittmair的方法模拟主动脉强化曲线。
观察到EAP期间主动脉强化与LAP期间TLC之间存在相对较强的相关性(相关系数r = 0.75,P < 0.001)。肿瘤显影等级为1、2和3级的患者EAP期间主动脉强化总体均值的95%置信区间分别为188.5、222.4;228.8、259.3;和280.2、322.5 HU(亨氏单位)。因此,我们认为EAP期间对HCC进行良好显示时主动脉强化值的下限为280 HU。为了在EAP期间的主动脉强化模拟中达到>280 HU的主动脉强化值,接受1.7 ml/kg、碘浓度为300 mg I/ml CM剂量的患者注射持续时间应<25秒,接受2.0 ml/kg剂量的患者注射持续时间应<30秒。
为了在肝动脉期良好显示富血供HCC,接受1.7 ml/kg、碘浓度为300 mg I/ml CM剂量的患者注射持续时间应<25秒,接受2.0 ml/kg剂量的患者注射持续时间应<30秒。