Dimichele D
Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jul;5 Suppl 1:143-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02474.x.
Currently, the only proven strategy for achieving antigen-specific tolerance to factor VIII (FVIII) is immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy. This paper discusses our current knowledge of the host and treatment factors, as well as supportive care initiatives, known or suspected to influence the outcome of ITI in the treatment of inhibitors arising in patients with severe hemophilia A. Among these, questions surrounding the choice of therapeutic product and/or dosing regimen generate the most controversy, given the lack of a definitive evidence-based approach to either. Furthermore, the potential for central venous access device (CVAD) and intercurrent bleeding complications to impact the ultimate success of ITI remains unclear. The ongoing clinical trials designed to further clarify several of these polarizing issues are reviewed. This paper also explores the current and future role of immune modulation in possible salvage, ancillary or primary alternative tolerance induction strategies. The special cases of low titer/ responding inhibitors and inhibitors developing in mild hemophilia A patients are considered. Finally, this paper summarizes the currently recommended approach to ITI and makes the case for a move from empiric therapeutics to a risk-stratified evidence-based approach to FVIII inhibitor eradication.
目前,实现针对凝血因子VIII(FVIII)的抗原特异性耐受的唯一已证实策略是免疫耐受诱导(ITI)疗法。本文讨论了我们目前对宿主和治疗因素的了解,以及已知或疑似会影响严重血友病A患者中出现抑制剂时ITI治疗结果的支持性护理措施。其中,鉴于缺乏明确的循证方法,围绕治疗产品的选择和/或给药方案的问题引发了最多争议。此外,中心静脉通路装置(CVAD)和并发出血并发症对ITI最终成功的影响仍不明确。本文回顾了旨在进一步阐明其中几个有争议问题的正在进行的临床试验。本文还探讨了免疫调节在可能的挽救、辅助或主要替代耐受诱导策略中的当前和未来作用。考虑了低滴度/反应性抑制剂以及轻度血友病A患者中出现抑制剂的特殊情况。最后,本文总结了目前推荐的ITI方法,并提出了从经验性治疗转向基于风险分层的循证方法以根除FVIII抑制剂的理由。