Suppr超能文献

撤回:绒毛取样与羊膜穿刺术用于产前诊断的比较

WITHDRAWN: Chorion villus sampling versus amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis.

作者信息

Alfirevic Z, Gosden C M, Neilson J P

机构信息

University of Liverpool, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liverpool, UK, L69 3BX.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1996 Apr 22(1):CD000055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000055.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Amniocentesis test results are usually available only after 18 weeks gestation. Chorion villus sampling (CVS) may be performed transabdominally or transvaginally, usually between 10 and 12 weeks gestation.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the safety and accuracy of chorion villus sampling compared to amniocentesis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing first trimester chorion villus sampling and second trimester amniocentesis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial quality was assessed.

MAIN RESULTS

Three studies involving over 9000 women were included. The trials were generally of good quality. Compared to amniocentesis, chorion villus sampling was associated with more sampling and technical failures, and more false positive and false negative results. Pregnancy loss was more common after chorion villus sampling (odds ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.52). There is a suggestion (though not statistically significant) of an increase in stillbirths and neonatal deaths following chorion villus sampling. Maternal complications were uncommon.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The increase in miscarriages after chorion villus sampling compared to amniocentesis appear to be procedure related. Second trimester amniocentesis appears to be safer than chorion villus sampling. The benefits of earlier diagnosis with chorion villus sampling must be set against the greater risk of pregnancy loss.

摘要

背景

羊水穿刺检查结果通常在妊娠18周后才能获得。绒毛取样(CVS)可经腹或经阴道进行,通常在妊娠10至12周之间。

目的

本综述的目的是评估绒毛取样与羊水穿刺相比的安全性和准确性。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库。

选择标准

比较孕早期绒毛取样和孕中期羊水穿刺的随机试验。

数据收集与分析

评估试验质量。

主要结果

纳入了三项涉及9000多名女性的研究。这些试验质量总体良好。与羊水穿刺相比,绒毛取样与更多的取样和技术失败以及更多的假阳性和假阴性结果相关。绒毛取样后妊娠丢失更为常见(优势比1.33,95%置信区间1.17至1.52)。有迹象表明(尽管无统计学意义)绒毛取样后死产和新生儿死亡有所增加。母体并发症不常见。

作者结论

与羊水穿刺相比,绒毛取样后流产增加似乎与操作有关。孕中期羊水穿刺似乎比绒毛取样更安全。绒毛取样早期诊断的益处必须与更高的妊娠丢失风险相权衡。

相似文献

1
WITHDRAWN: Chorion villus sampling versus amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1996 Apr 22(1):CD000055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000055.
2
Chorion villus sampling versus amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;1996(2):CD000055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000055.
3
WITHDRAWN: Early amniocentesis versus transabdominal chorion villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD000077. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000077.
4
Early amniocentesis versus transabdominal chorion villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;1999(2):CD000077. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000077.
5
Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 4;9(9):CD003252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003252.pub2.
6
Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD003252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003252.
8
Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated meta-analysis.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):442-451. doi: 10.1002/uog.20353. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
9
Technique modifications for reducing the risks from amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15(8):CD008678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008678.pub2.
10
The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities.
N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 9;320(10):609-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903093201001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验