Peloso P, Gross A, Haines T, Trinh K, Goldsmith C H, Burnie S
Amgen, Inc, One Amgen Center Drive, MS 38-2-C, Thousand Oaks, California 91320, USA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD000319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000319.pub4.
Controversy persists regarding medicinal therapies and injections.
To determine the effects of medication and injections on primary outcomes (e.g. pain) for adults with mechanical neck disorders and whiplash.
We searched CENTRAL, MANTIS, CINAHL from their start to May 2006; MEDLINE and EMBASE to December 2006. We scrutinised reference lists for other trials.
We included randomised controlled trials with adults with neck disorders, with or without associated headache or radicular findings. We considered medicinal and injection therapies, regardless of route of administration.
Two authors independently selected articles, abstracted data and assessed methodological quality. When clinical heterogeneity was absent, we combined studies using random-effects models.
We found 36 trials that examined the effects of oral NSAIDs, psychotropic agents, steroid injections, and anaesthetic agents. Trials had a mean of 3.1 on the Jadad Scale for methodological quality; 70% were high quality. For acute whiplash, administering intravenous methylprednisolone within eight hours of injury reduced pain at one week (SMD -0.90, 95% CI -1.57 to -0.24), and sick leave but not pain at six months compared to placebo in one trial. For chronic neck disorders at short-term follow-up, intramuscular injection of lidocaine was superior to placebo (SMD -1.36, 95% CI -1.93 to -0.80); NNT 3, treatment advantage 45% and dry needling, but similar to ultrasound in one trial each. In chronic neck disorders with radicular findings, epidural methylprednisolone and lidocaine reduced neck pain and improved function more than when given by intramuscular route at one-year follow-up, in one trial. In subacute and chronic neck disorders, muscle relaxants, analgesics and NSAIDs had limited evidence and unclear benefits. In participants with chronic neck disorders with or without radicular findings or headache, there was moderate evidence from five high quality trials that Botulinum toxin A intramuscular injections had similar effects to saline in improving pain (pooled SMD: -0.39, 95%CI -1.25 to 0.47), disability or global perceived effect.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The major limitations are the lack of replication of the findings and sufficiently large trials. There is moderate evidence for the benefit of intravenous methylprednisolone given within eight hours of acute whiplash, from a single trial. Lidocaine injection into myofascial trigger points appears effective in two trials. There is moderate evidence that Botulinum toxin A is not superior to saline injection for chronic MND. Muscle relaxants, analgesics and NSAIDs had limited evidence and unclear benefits.
关于药物治疗和注射疗法仍存在争议。
确定药物和注射疗法对患有机械性颈部疾病和挥鞭伤的成年人的主要结局(如疼痛)的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库(CENTRAL)、MANTIS数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL),检索时间从建库至2006年5月;检索了医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)和荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)至2006年12月。我们仔细查阅了其他试验的参考文献列表。
我们纳入了针对患有颈部疾病的成年人的随机对照试验,无论是否伴有头痛或神经根症状。我们考虑了药物和注射疗法,无论给药途径如何。
两位作者独立选择文章、提取数据并评估方法学质量。当不存在临床异质性时,我们使用随机效应模型合并研究。
我们发现36项试验研究了口服非甾体抗炎药、精神药物、类固醇注射剂和麻醉剂的效果。试验在Jadad方法学质量量表上的平均得分为3.1分;70%为高质量试验。对于急性挥鞭伤,在受伤后8小时内静脉注射甲泼尼龙可减轻1周时的疼痛(标准化均数差 -0.90,95%可信区间 -1.57至 -0.24),在一项试验中,与安慰剂相比,还可减少6个月时的病假,但疼痛无差异。对于慢性颈部疾病,短期随访时,肌内注射利多卡因优于安慰剂(标准化均数差 -1.36,95%可信区间 -1.93至 -0.80);需治疗人数为3,治疗优势为45%,干针疗法在一项试验中效果相似,但在另一项试验中与超声疗法效果相似。在一项试验中,对于伴有神经根症状的慢性颈部疾病,在1年随访时,硬膜外注射甲泼尼龙和利多卡因比肌内注射更能减轻颈部疼痛并改善功能。在亚急性和慢性颈部疾病中,肌肉松弛剂、镇痛药和非甾体抗炎药的证据有限且益处不明确。在患有慢性颈部疾病且伴有或不伴有神经根症状或头痛的参与者中,五项高质量试验提供了中等证据,表明肌内注射肉毒杆菌毒素A在改善疼痛(合并标准化均数差:-0.39,95%可信区间 -1.25至0.47)、残疾或总体感知效果方面与注射生理盐水相似。
主要局限性在于研究结果缺乏重复性且试验规模不够大。一项试验提供了中等证据,表明急性挥鞭伤后8小时内静脉注射甲泼尼龙有益。在两项试验中,向肌筋膜触发点注射利多卡因似乎有效。有中等证据表明,对于慢性颈部疾病,肉毒杆菌毒素A并不优于注射生理盐水。肌肉松弛剂、镇痛药和非甾体抗炎药的证据有限且益处不明确。