Bouscarel B, Fromm H, Ceryak S, Cassidy M M
Department of Medicine, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20037.
Biochem J. 1991 Dec 15;280 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):589-98. doi: 10.1042/bj2800589.
Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), in contrast to both chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), its 7 alpha-epimer, and lithocholic acid, enhanced receptor-dependent low-density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake and degradation in isolated hamster hepatocytes. The increase in cell-associated LDL was time- and concentration-dependent, with a maximum effect observed at approx. 60 min with 1 mM-UDCA. This increase was not associated with a detergent effect of UDCA, as no significant modifications were observed either in the cellular release of lactate dehydrogenase or in Trypan Blue exclusion. The effect of UDCA was not due to a modification of the LDL particle, but rather was receptor-related. UDCA (1 mM) maximally increased the number of 125I-LDL-binding sites (Bmax.) by 35%, from 176 to 240 ng/mg of protein, without a significant modification of the binding affinity. Furthermore, following proteolytic degradation of the LDL receptor with Pronase, specific LDL binding decreased to the level of non-specific binding, and the effect of UDCA was abolished. Conversely, the trihydroxy 7 beta-hydroxy bile acid ursocholic acid and its 7 alpha-epimer, cholic acid, induced a significant decrease in LDL binding by approx. 15%. The C23 analogue of UDCA (nor-UDCA) and CDCA did not affect LDL binding. On the other hand, UDCA conjugated with either glycine (GUDCA) or taurine (TUDCA), increased LDL binding to the same extent as did the free bile acid. The half maximum time (t1/2) to reach the full effect was 1-2 min for UDCA and TUDCA, while GUDCA had a much slower t1/2 of 8.3 min. Ketoconazole (50 microM), an antifungal agent, increased LDL binding, but this effect was not additive when tested in the presence of 0.7 mM-UDCA. The results of the studies indicate that, in isolated hamster hepatocytes, the UDCA-induced increase in receptor-dependent LDL binding and uptake represents a direct effect of this bile acid. The action of the bile acid is closely related to its specific structural conformation, since UDCA and its conjugates are the only bile acids shown to express this ability thus far. However, certain agents other than bile acids, such as ketoconazole, have a similar effect. Finally, the studies suggest that the recruitment of LDL receptors from a latent pool in the hepatocellular membrane may be the mechanism by which UDCA exerts its direct effect.
与鹅去氧胆酸(CDCA,其7α-差向异构体)和石胆酸相比,熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)可增强分离的仓鼠肝细胞中受体依赖性低密度脂蛋白(LDL)的摄取和降解。细胞相关LDL的增加具有时间和浓度依赖性,在约60分钟时用1 mM UDCA可观察到最大效应。这种增加与UDCA的去污剂作用无关,因为在乳酸脱氢酶的细胞释放或台盼蓝排斥试验中均未观察到明显变化。UDCA的作用不是由于LDL颗粒的改变,而是与受体相关。UDCA(1 mM)最大程度地使125I-LDL结合位点(Bmax.)的数量增加了35%,从176 ng/mg蛋白质增加到240 ng/mg蛋白质,而结合亲和力没有明显改变。此外,用链霉蛋白酶对LDL受体进行蛋白水解降解后,特异性LDL结合降低到非特异性结合水平,UDCA的作用被消除。相反,三羟基7β-羟基胆汁酸熊胆酸及其7α-差向异构体胆酸使LDL结合显著降低约15%。UDCA的C23类似物(去氢UDCA)和CDCA不影响LDL结合。另一方面,与甘氨酸(GUDCA)或牛磺酸(TUDCA)结合的UDCA与游离胆汁酸一样,能增加LDL结合。UDCA和TUDCA达到最大效应一半的时间(t1/2)为1 - 2分钟,而GUDCA的t1/2则慢得多,为8.3分钟。抗真菌剂酮康唑(50 μM)可增加LDL结合,但在0.7 mM UDCA存在下进行测试时,这种效应没有叠加。研究结果表明,在分离的仓鼠肝细胞中,UDCA诱导的受体依赖性LDL结合和摄取的增加代表了这种胆汁酸的直接作用。胆汁酸的作用与其特定的结构构象密切相关,因为UDCA及其共轭物是迄今为止唯一显示出这种能力的胆汁酸。然而,某些非胆汁酸类药物,如酮康唑,也有类似作用。最后,研究表明从肝细胞膜中的潜在池中募集LDL受体可能是UDCA发挥其直接作用的机制。