Suppr超能文献

鸽子(家鸽)的视野组织与啄击定位

Visual field organization and peck localization in the pigeon (Columba livia).

作者信息

Jager R, Zeigler H P

机构信息

Biopsychology Program, Hunter College, CUNY.

出版信息

Behav Brain Res. 1991 Oct 25;45(1):65-9. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80181-0.

Abstract

Some aspects of the stimulus control of peck localization in the pigeon were examined using conditioning paradigms, visual occlusion procedures, and 'touch-screen' technology. Birds were reinforced for pecks made to a small circular (target) stimulus projected upon a computer monitor and located within an electronically defined contingency area. The terminal location of each peck was monitored under binocular and monocular viewing conditions and when using either the frontal or lateral visual fields. Peck localization was highly accurate under either binocular or monocular viewing conditions or with the frontal field alone; there were no systematic differences between the right and left eyes and differences between monocular and binocular localization performance, though significant, were minimal. When viewing with the lateral field alone, subjects were initially unable to locate the food hopper and, even after retraining, conditioned peck localization was profoundly disrupted. The results confirm previous reports of functional differences between the frontal and lateral visual fields, but suggest that monocular cues are sufficient for highly accurate peck localization.

摘要

利用条件反射范式、视觉遮挡程序和“触摸屏”技术,对鸽子啄击定位的刺激控制的某些方面进行了研究。对在电脑显示器上投射的、位于电子定义的应急区域内的小圆形(目标)刺激进行啄击的鸟类会得到强化。在双眼和单眼观察条件下以及使用额侧或颞侧视野时,监测每次啄击的最终位置。在双眼或单眼观察条件下或仅使用额侧视野时,啄击定位都非常准确;左右眼之间没有系统性差异,单眼和双眼定位表现之间的差异虽然显著,但很小。仅用颞侧视野观察时,受试者最初无法找到食槽,即使经过再训练,条件性啄击定位也受到严重干扰。结果证实了先前关于额侧和颞侧视野功能差异的报道,但表明单眼线索足以实现高度准确的啄击定位。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验