Suppr超能文献

在肾移植受者中,与他克莫司相比,移植后早期西罗莫司的暴露降低了巨细胞病毒感染的风险。

Sirolimus exposure during the early post-transplant period reduces the risk of CMV infection relative to tacrolimus in renal allograft recipients.

作者信息

Haririan Abdolreza, Morawski Katherina, West Miguel S, El-Amm Jose M, Doshi Mona D, Cincotta Elizabeth, Alangaden George J, Chandrasekar Pranatharthi, Gruber Scott A

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Wayne State Uinversity School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):466-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00669.x.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are limited data regarding the role of individual maintenance immunosuppressive agents in the development of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. We examined the association between exposure to sirolimus (SRL) and risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation when compared with tacrolimus (TCL).

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study of adult renal allograft recipients transplanted between 2001 and 2005 at our center. Patients received anti-lymphocyte antibody induction, and mycophenolate mofetil with either SRL or TCL +/- prednisone. D+/R- patients received valganciclovir 900 mg/d and CMV + patients 450 mg/d for three months. CMV infection was diagnosed with pp65 antigenemia testing prompted by clinical suspicion.

RESULTS

A total of 14 Cases with CMV infection and 129 Controls were identified for primary analysis, and 11 D+/R- Cases and 19 D+/R- Controls for secondary analysis. The groups were comparable in both analyses, except for D+/R- serostatus in the primary analysis. All 14 Cases were on TCL for at least three months prior to diagnosis of CMV infection. In the primary analysis, zero Cases, but 30.2% and 34.9% of Controls (p = 0.009 and 0.004), and in secondary analysis, zero Cases, but 31.6% and 42.1% of Controls (p = 0.046 and 0.013), were on SRL at one and three months, respectively. In the primary analysis, zero Cases vs. 45 Controls (p = 0.004), and in secondary analysis, zero Cases vs. eight Controls (p = 0.013), were on SRL for at least three months early post-transplantation.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that SRL as a component of a multidrug immunosuppressive regimen decreases the risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation when compared with TCL.

摘要

引言

关于个体维持性免疫抑制剂在巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染发生中的作用的数据有限。我们研究了与他克莫司(TCL)相比,肾移植后西罗莫司(SRL)暴露与CMV感染风险之间的关联。

方法

这是一项对2001年至2005年在本中心接受移植的成年肾移植受者的回顾性观察研究。患者接受抗淋巴细胞抗体诱导治疗,并使用霉酚酸酯联合SRL或TCL以及泼尼松(±)。D+/R-患者接受缬更昔洛韦900mg/d治疗,CMV+患者接受450mg/d治疗,为期三个月。根据临床怀疑通过pp65抗原血症检测诊断CMV感染。

结果

共确定14例CMV感染病例和129例对照进行初步分析,11例D+/R-病例和19例D+/R-对照进行二次分析。除了初步分析中的D+/R-血清学状态外,两组在两项分析中具有可比性。所有14例病例在诊断CMV感染前至少三个月使用TCL。在初步分析中,病例组为零,但对照组在1个月和3个月时分别有30.2%和34.9%使用SRL(p = 0.009和0.004);在二次分析中,病例组为零,但对照组在1个月和3个月时分别有31.6%和42.1%使用SRL(p = 0.046和0.013)。在初步分析中,病例组为零,45例对照组使用SRL(p = 0.004);在二次分析中,病例组为零,8例对照组使用SRL(p = 0.013),这些对照组在移植后早期至少三个月使用SRL。

结论

这些发现表明,与TCL相比,作为多药免疫抑制方案组成部分的SRL可降低肾移植后CMV感染的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验