Patel Vaishali N, Riley Anne W
Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;34(4):459-74. doi: 10.1007/s11414-007-9064-4. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
A multiple case study was conducted to examine how staff in child out-of-home care programs used data from an Outcomes Management System (OMS) and other sources to inform decision-making. Data collection consisted of thirty-seven semi-structured interviews with clinicians, managers, and directors from two treatment foster care programs and two residential treatment centers, and individuals involved with developing the OMS; and observations of clinical and quality management meetings. Case study and grounded theory methodology guided analyses. The application of qualitative data analysis software is described. Results show that although staff rarely used data from the OMS, they did rely on other sources of systematically collected information to inform clinical, quality management, and program decisions. Analyses of how staff used these data suggest that improving the utility of OMS will involve encouraging staff to participate in data-based decision-making, and designing and implementing OMS in a manner that reflects how decision-making processes operate.
开展了一项多案例研究,以考察儿童家庭外照料项目的工作人员如何利用来自成果管理系统(OMS)及其他来源的数据为决策提供依据。数据收集工作包括对来自两个治疗性寄养照料项目和两个住院治疗中心的临床医生、管理人员及主任,以及参与开发OMS的人员进行37次半结构化访谈;并对临床和质量管理会议进行观察。案例研究和扎根理论方法指导了分析工作。文中描述了定性数据分析软件的应用情况。结果显示,尽管工作人员很少使用OMS的数据,但他们确实依赖其他系统收集的信息来源为临床、质量管理及项目决策提供依据。对工作人员如何使用这些数据的分析表明,提高OMS的效用将涉及鼓励工作人员参与基于数据的决策,并以反映决策过程运作方式的方式设计和实施OMS。