Wutte A, Plank J, Bodenlenz M, Magnes C, Regittnig W, Sinner F, Rønn B, Zdravkovic M, Pieber T R
Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetes and Metabolism, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2007 Jul;115(7):461-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-976512.
This study was conducted to evaluate the dose ratio of insulin detemir and neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin over a range of therapeutically relevant subcutaneous doses.
The study was a randomized, double-blind, crossover 24-h-iso-glycemic clamp trial in 12 C-peptide-negative type 1 diabetic patients. Each subject received, by an incomplete block design selection, two of three possible doses of insulin detemir (0.15, 0.3, 0.6 U/kg) and NPH insulin (0.15, 0.3, 0.6 IU/kg), respectively. A detailed assessment of endogenous glucose production (EGP) and glucose uptake was performed, by use of stable isotopic labeled glucose tracer (D-[6,6- (2)H (2)] glucose).
Dose proportionality was observed within the tested dose range. Regarding unit dose ratio, 0.68 U insulin detemir equals 1 IU NPH insulin (95% CI [0.35; 1.30]). There was no statistically significant difference in effect on the area under the curve (AUC) of glucose infusion rate (GIR) (AUC (GIR)) and the maximal GIR (GIR (max)) values, when comparing U (insulin detemir) to IU (NPH insulin). The pharmacodynamic within-subject profile was lower with insulin detemir in regard to AUC (GIR 0-24 h), GIR (max) and duration of action ( P<0.05). There was a tendency for a greater reduction of EGP with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin in regard to the area over the curve (AOC) of EGP in 24 hours (AOC (EGP 0-24 h)) ( P=0.07) and minimal EPG (EGP (min)) ( P=0.02).
These data show that insulin detemir is dose-proportional to NPH insulin in type 1 diabetic patients at clinically relevant doses. The data indicate that insulin detemir has a lower degree of within-subject variability.
本研究旨在评估在一系列治疗相关的皮下注射剂量范围内,地特胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH胰岛素)的剂量比。
该研究是一项针对12名C肽阴性的1型糖尿病患者的随机、双盲、交叉24小时等血糖钳夹试验。通过不完全区组设计选择,每位受试者分别接受三种可能剂量的地特胰岛素(0.15、0.3、0.6 U/kg)和NPH胰岛素(0.15、0.3、0.6 IU/kg)中的两种。使用稳定同位素标记的葡萄糖示踪剂(D-[6,6-(2)H(2)]葡萄糖)对内源性葡萄糖生成(EGP)和葡萄糖摄取进行了详细评估。
在测试剂量范围内观察到剂量比例关系。关于单位剂量比,0.68 U地特胰岛素等于1 IU NPH胰岛素(95%置信区间[0.35; 1.30])。比较U(地特胰岛素)与IU(NPH胰岛素)时,对葡萄糖输注速率(GIR)的曲线下面积(AUC)(AUC(GIR))和最大GIR(GIR(max))值的影响无统计学显著差异。就AUC(GIR 0 - 24小时)、GIR(max)和作用持续时间而言,地特胰岛素的受试者内药效学特征较低(P<0.05)。在24小时内EGP的曲线下面积(AOC)(AOC(EGP 0 - 24小时))(P = 0.07)和最低EPG(EGP(min))(P = 0.02)方面,地特胰岛素使EGP降低的趋势大于NPH胰岛素。
这些数据表明,在临床相关剂量下,1型糖尿病患者中地特胰岛素与NPH胰岛素呈剂量比例关系。数据表明地特胰岛素的受试者内变异性较低。