Suppr超能文献

定性数据收集与分析方法:本能试验

Qualitative data collection and analysis methods: the INSTINCT trial.

作者信息

Meurer William J, Frederiksen Shirley M, Majersik Jennifer J, Zhang Lingling, Sandretto Annette, Scott Phillip A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;14(11):1064-71. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Jul 24.

Abstract

Patient care practices often lag behind current scientific evidence and professional guidelines. The failure of such knowledge translation (KT) efforts may reflect inadequate assessment and management of specific barriers confronting both physicians and patients at the point of treatment level. Effective KT in this setting may benefit from the use of qualitative methods to identify and overcome these barriers. Qualitative methodology allows in-depth exploration of the barriers involved in adopting practice change and has been infrequently used in emergency medicine research. The authors describe the methodology for qualitative analysis within the INcreasing Stroke Treatment through INteractive behavioral Change Tactics (INSTINCT) trial. This includes processes for valid data collection and reliable analysis of the textual data from focus group and interview transcripts. INSTINCT is a 24-hospital, randomized, controlled study that is designed to evaluate a system-based barrier assessment and interactive educational intervention to increase appropriate tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) use in ischemic stroke. Intervention hospitals undergo baseline barrier assessment using both qualitative as well as quantitative (survey) techniques. Investigators obtain data on local barriers to tPA use, as well as information on local attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs regarding acute stroke treatment. Targeted groups at each site include emergency physicians, emergency nurses, neurologists, radiologists, and hospital administrators. Transcript analysis using NVivo7 with a predefined barrier taxonomy is described. This will provide both qualitative insight on thrombolytic use and importance of specific barrier types for each site. The qualitative findings subsequently direct the form of professional education efforts and system interventions at treatment sites.

摘要

患者护理实践往往落后于当前的科学证据和专业指南。这种知识转化(KT)努力的失败可能反映出在治疗层面上,对医生和患者所面临的特定障碍的评估和管理不足。在这种情况下,有效的知识转化可能受益于使用定性方法来识别和克服这些障碍。定性方法能够深入探究采用实践变革过程中涉及的障碍,且在急诊医学研究中很少被使用。作者描述了通过交互式行为改变策略增加中风治疗(INSTINCT)试验中的定性分析方法。这包括有效数据收集以及对焦点小组和访谈记录的文本数据进行可靠分析的过程。INSTINCT是一项由24家医院参与的随机对照研究,旨在评估一种基于系统的障碍评估和交互式教育干预措施,以增加缺血性中风中组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)的合理使用。干预医院使用定性和定量(调查)技术进行基线障碍评估。研究人员获取关于当地使用tPA的障碍数据,以及关于当地对急性中风治疗的态度、知识和信念的信息。每个地点的目标群体包括急诊医生、急诊护士、神经科医生、放射科医生和医院管理人员。描述了使用NVivo7并依据预定义的障碍分类法进行的转录本分析。这将为每个地点的溶栓使用情况以及特定障碍类型的重要性提供定性见解。定性研究结果随后指导治疗地点的专业教育努力和系统干预的形式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验