Chong Alexander C M, Miller Forrest, Buxton McKee, Friis Elizabeth A
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
J Biomech Eng. 2007 Aug;129(4):487-93. doi: 10.1115/1.2746369.
Third-generation mechanical analogue bone models and synthetic analogue cortical bone materials manufactured by Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc. (PRL) are popular tools for use in mechanical testing of various orthopedic implants and biomaterials. A major issue with these models is that the current third-generation epoxy-short fiberglass based composite used as the cortical bone substitute is prone to crack formation and failure in fatigue or repeated quasistatic loading of the model. The purpose of the present study was to compare the tensile and fracture mechanics properties of the current baseline (established PRL "third-generation" E-glass-fiber-epoxy) composite analogue for cortical bone to a new composite material formulation proposed for use as an enhanced fourth-generation cortical bone analogue material. Standard tensile, plane strain fracture toughness, and fatigue crack propagation rate tests were performed on both the third- and fourth-generation composite material formulations using standard ASTM test techniques. Injection molding techniques were used to create random fiber orientation in all test specimens. Standard dog-bone style tensile specimens were tested to obtain ultimate tensile strength and stiffness. Compact tension fracture toughness specimens were utilized to determine plane strain fracture toughness values. Reduced thickness compact tension specimens were also used to determine fatigue crack propagation rate behavior for the two material groups. Literature values for the same parameters for human cortical bone were compared to results from the third- and fourth-generation cortical analogue bone materials. Tensile properties of the fourth-generation material were closer to that of average human cortical bone than the third-generation material. Fracture toughness was significantly increased by 48% in the fourth-generation composite as compared to the third-generation analogue bone. The threshold stress intensity to propagate the crack was much higher for the fourth-generation material than for the third-generation composite. Even at the higher stress intensity threshold, the fatigue crack propagation rate was significantly decreased in the fourth-generation composite compared to the third-generation composite. These results indicate that the bone analogue models made from the fourth-generation analogue cortical bone material may exhibit better performance in fracture and longer fatigue lives than similar models made of third-generation analogue cortical bone material. Further fatigue testing of the new composite material in clinically relevant use of bone models is still required for verification of these results. Biomechanical test models using the superior fourth-generation cortical analogue material are currently in development.
由太平洋研究实验室公司(PRL)制造的第三代机械模拟骨模型和合成模拟皮质骨材料,是用于各种骨科植入物和生物材料机械测试的常用工具。这些模型的一个主要问题是,目前用作皮质骨替代品的基于环氧短玻璃纤维的第三代复合材料,在模型的疲劳或反复准静态加载过程中容易形成裂纹并失效。本研究的目的是将当前用于皮质骨的基线(既定的PRL“第三代”E玻璃纤维 - 环氧树脂)复合模拟材料的拉伸和断裂力学性能,与一种新提出的用作增强型第四代皮质骨模拟材料的复合材料配方进行比较。使用标准的ASTM测试技术,对第三代和第四代复合材料配方进行了标准拉伸、平面应变断裂韧性和疲劳裂纹扩展速率测试。注射成型技术用于在所有测试样品中产生随机纤维取向。测试标准狗骨式拉伸试样以获得极限拉伸强度和刚度。使用紧凑拉伸断裂韧性试样来确定平面应变断裂韧性值。还使用厚度减小的紧凑拉伸试样来确定两种材料组的疲劳裂纹扩展速率行为。将人体皮质骨相同参数的文献值与第三代和第四代皮质模拟骨材料的结果进行了比较。与第三代材料相比,第四代材料的拉伸性能更接近人类平均皮质骨。与第三代模拟骨相比,第四代复合材料的断裂韧性显著提高了48%。第四代材料使裂纹扩展的阈值应力强度比第三代复合材料高得多。即使在较高的应力强度阈值下,与第三代复合材料相比,第四代复合材料的疲劳裂纹扩展速率也显著降低。这些结果表明,由第四代模拟皮质骨材料制成的骨模拟模型,在断裂方面可能比由第三代模拟皮质骨材料制成的类似模型表现出更好的性能,并且疲劳寿命更长。仍需要在骨模型的临床相关应用中对这种新型复合材料进行进一步的疲劳测试,以验证这些结果。目前正在开发使用优质第四代皮质模拟材料的生物力学测试模型。