Ose L, Johnson-Levonas A, Reyes R, Lin J, Shah A, Tribble D, Musliner T
Lipid Clinic, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Sep;61(9):1469-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01402.x. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of ezetimibe/simvastatin (EZE/SIMVA) tablet and SIMVA monotherapy. This was an extension study of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Protocol-compliant patients who completed the 12-week base study were eligible to enter a randomised, double-blind, 14-week extension study and were administered 1 of 8 daily treatments: EZE/SIMVA 10/10-, 10/20-, 10/40- or 10/80-mg, or SIMVA 10-, 20-, 40- or 80-mg. Patients receiving these treatments during the base study remained on the same treatment in the extension. Patients administered placebo or EZE 10-mg monotherapy during the base study were re-randomised to EZE/SIMVA 10/10 mg or SIMVA 80 mg. The primary analysis was mean per cent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline to extension study end-point. Mean changes from baseline in LDL-C of -38.8% and -53.7% were observed for pooled SIMVA and pooled EZE/SIMVA respectively. The between treatment difference of -14.9% (95% confidence interval: -16.4, -13.3) was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The incremental LDL-C lowering effect of EZE/SIMVA compared with the corresponding dose of SIMVA alone was consistent across the dose range (p < 0.001 for each between-group comparison). More patients receiving EZE/SIMVA than SIMVA achieved LDL-C concentrations < 100 mg/dl and < 70 mg/dl (p < 0.001 for both goals). EZE/SIMVA was generally well tolerated with a safety profile similar to SIMVA monotherapy. There were no significant between-group differences in the incidences of clinically significant elevations in liver transaminase or creatine kinase levels. In conclusion, EZE/SIMVA had a comparable safety and tolerability profile and was more efficacious than SIMVA monotherapy for up to 6 months.
本研究的目的是比较依折麦布/辛伐他汀(EZE/SIMVA)片与辛伐他汀单药治疗的疗效和安全性。这是一项针对原发性高胆固醇血症患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的扩展研究。完成12周基础研究且符合方案的患者有资格进入一项随机、双盲、为期14周的扩展研究,并接受8种每日治疗方案中的一种:EZE/SIMVA 10/10毫克、10/20毫克、10/40毫克或10/80毫克,或辛伐他汀10毫克、20毫克、40毫克或80毫克。在基础研究期间接受这些治疗的患者在扩展研究中继续接受相同治疗。在基础研究期间接受安慰剂或依折麦布10毫克单药治疗的患者被重新随机分配至EZE/SIMVA 10/10毫克或辛伐他汀80毫克。主要分析是从基线到扩展研究终点低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的平均百分比变化。汇总的辛伐他汀组和汇总的EZE/SIMVA组的LDL-C自基线的平均变化分别为-38.8%和-53.7%。治疗组间差异为-14.9%(95%置信区间:-16.4,-13.3),具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。与相应剂量的单药辛伐他汀相比,EZE/SIMVA的LDL-C额外降低效果在整个剂量范围内是一致的(每组组间比较p<0.001)。与辛伐他汀相比,更多接受EZE/SIMVA治疗的患者实现了LDL-C浓度<100毫克/分升和<70毫克/分升(两个目标的p均<0.001)。EZE/SIMVA总体耐受性良好,安全性与辛伐他汀单药治疗相似。肝转氨酶或肌酸激酶水平临床显著升高的发生率在组间无显著差异。总之,EZE/SIMVA具有相当的安全性和耐受性,在长达6个月的时间里比辛伐他汀单药治疗更有效。