Sarlegna Fabrice R, Gauthier Gabriel M, Blouin Jean
UMR Mouvement & Perception, CNRS and Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France.
J Mot Behav. 2007 Jul;39(4):247-58. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.39.4.247-258.
In 4 studies, the authors tested the contributions of visual, kinesthetic, and verbal knowledge of results to the adaptive control of reaching movements toward visual targets. The same apparatus was used in all experiments, but the procedures differed in the sensory modality of the feedback that participants (N s = 5, 5, 6, and 6, respectively, in Experiments 1, 2, 3, and 4) received about their performances. Using biased visual, proprioceptive, or verbal feedback, the authors introduced a 5 degrees shift in the visuomanual relationship. Results showed no significant difference in the final amount of adaptation to the mismatch: On average, participants adapted to 79% of the perturbation. That finding is consistent with the view that adaptation is a multisensory, highly flexible process whose efficiency does not depend on the sensory channel conveying the error signal.
在4项研究中,作者测试了视觉、动觉以及结果的言语知识对朝向视觉目标的伸手动作适应性控制的作用。所有实验都使用了相同的仪器,但在参与者(实验1、2、3和4中的人数分别为5、5、6和6)所获得的关于其表现的反馈的感觉模态方面,实验程序有所不同。作者通过有偏差的视觉、本体感觉或言语反馈,在视觉-手动关系中引入了5度的偏移。结果表明,对这种不匹配的最终适应量没有显著差异:平均而言,参与者适应了79%的扰动。这一发现与以下观点一致,即适应是一个多感官、高度灵活的过程,其效率不取决于传达误差信号的感觉通道。