Suppr超能文献

肩关节前路稳定术后的肌肉力量:关节镜下与切开Bankart修复术的比较

Muscle strength after anterior shoulder stabilization: arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair.

作者信息

Rhee Yong Girl, Lim Chan Teak, Cho Nam Su

机构信息

Shoulder & Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 1 Hoiki-dong, Dongdaemoonku, Seoul 130-702, Korea.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):1859-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546507304329. Epub 2007 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A number of reports have been made on the muscle strength at the last follow-up after arthroscopic or open Bankart repairs. Few have analyzed the change over time in muscle strength and compared the changes between different operative methods.

HYPOTHESIS

Muscle strength recovers faster after arthroscopic Bankart repair than after open Bankart repair, and the final muscle strength is not different between the 2 procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Sixty patients with anterior shoulder instability and an isolated Bankart lesion were enrolled for this study. Thirty patients underwent open Bankart repair (open group), and 30 patients went through arthroscopic Bankart repair (arthroscopic group).

RESULTS

The open group demonstrated markedly weaker muscle strength during forward elevation than did the arthroscopic group up to 3 months after surgery, but the difference narrowed to about 5% at 6 months (P = .074). At 6 months after surgery, the muscle strength of the open group measured 85.8% +/- 11.5% in forward elevation, 89.5% +/- 10.3% in external rotation, and 89.3% +/- 13.3% in internal rotation. The corresponding figures of the arthroscopic group were 90.6% +/- 8.6%, 92.1% +/- 9.1%, and 92.1% +/- 11.7%. As for external and internal rotations, the open group demonstrated markedly weaker muscle strength 6 weeks after surgery, but the differences were reduced to about 6% and 4%, respectively, at 3 months (P = .092 and .163, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in final muscle strength 12 months after the operation between the 2 groups (P = .503, .468, and .659, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Muscle strength recovered faster with an arthroscopic procedure than with an open procedure during the early postoperative periods, and strength was restored to the level of the unaffected side at 6 months postoperatively. In the group with open Bankart repairs, the muscle strength during forward elevation recovered slower than did external and internal rotation muscle strengths.

摘要

背景

已有多篇关于关节镜或开放性Bankart修复术后最后随访时肌肉力量的报道。很少有研究分析肌肉力量随时间的变化,并比较不同手术方法之间的变化。

假设

关节镜下Bankart修复术后肌肉力量恢复比开放性Bankart修复术后更快,且两种手术最终的肌肉力量无差异。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,2级。

方法

本研究纳入60例肩关节前向不稳且孤立性Bankart损伤的患者。30例患者接受开放性Bankart修复术(开放组),30例患者接受关节镜下Bankart修复术(关节镜组)。

结果

术后3个月内,开放组在前屈上举时的肌肉力量明显弱于关节镜组,但在6个月时差异缩小至约5%(P = 0.074)。术后6个月,开放组前屈上举的肌肉力量为85.8%±11.5%,外旋为89.5%±10.3%,内旋为89.3%±13.3%。关节镜组相应的数据分别为90.6%±8.6%、92.1%±9.1%和92.1%±11.7%。在术后6周时,开放组在外旋和内旋时的肌肉力量明显较弱,但在3个月时差异分别缩小至约6%和4%(分别为P = 0.092和0.163)。两组术后12个月时的最终肌肉力量无统计学显著差异(分别为P = 0.503、0.468和0.659)。

结论

术后早期,关节镜手术比开放手术肌肉力量恢复更快,术后6个月时力量恢复到未受影响侧的水平。在开放性Bankart修复组中,前屈上举时的肌肉力量恢复比外旋和内旋肌肉力量恢复慢。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验