Miller Catherine A, Tebb Kathleen P, Williams Jody K, Neuhaus John M, Shafer Mary-Ann B
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143-0503, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Aug;161(8):777-82. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.8.777.
To examine the association between adolescents' perception of clinician communication and adolescents' reported acceptability of the steps involved in chlamydial screening during urgent care visits.
Cross-sectional survey of adolescents after urgent care visits.
Four pediatric clinics in a health maintenance organization.
Three hundred sixty-five adolescents aged 13 to 18 years.
Participants' ratings of the acceptability of talking about sexual health and providing a urine sample for chlamydial testing in an urgent care visit.
Most adolescents found sexual health discussions and urine collection for chlamydial screening acceptable in the urgent care setting (84% and 80%, respectively). Acceptability of sexual health discussion was significantly associated with adolescents' perception that the clinician explained confidentiality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-5.5), knew "how to talk to teens like me" (AOR, 9.0; 95% CI, 3.5-24.2), and "listened carefully as I explained my concerns" (AOR, 14.3; 95% CI, 4.3-54.9). Acceptability of providing a urine sample for chlamydial testing was associated with the adolescents' perception that the clinician knew "how to talk to teens like me" (AOR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.5-9.3) and "listened carefully as I explained my concerns" (AOR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-11.5).
Sexual history taking and urine collection are 2 key components of chlamydial screening and were reported as acceptable by the great majority of adolescents in the urgent care setting. Aspects of clinician communication appear to be important target areas for pediatric clinician education in supporting expansion of chlamydial screening to adolescents in urgent care visits.
探讨青少年对临床医生沟通的认知与青少年报告的在紧急护理就诊期间衣原体筛查所涉及步骤的可接受性之间的关联。
对紧急护理就诊后的青少年进行横断面调查。
一家健康维护组织中的四家儿科诊所。
365名年龄在13至18岁的青少年。
参与者对在紧急护理就诊时谈论性健康以及提供衣原体检测尿液样本的可接受性评分。
大多数青少年认为在紧急护理环境中进行性健康讨论和采集衣原体筛查尿液样本是可以接受的(分别为84%和80%)。性健康讨论的可接受性与青少年认为临床医生解释了保密性(调整优势比[AOR],2.7;95%置信区间[CI],1.3 - 5.5)、知道“如何与像我这样的青少年交谈”(AOR,9.0;95%CI,3.5 - 24.2)以及“在我解释我的担忧时认真倾听”(AOR,14.3;95%CI,4.3 - 54.9)显著相关。提供衣原体检测尿液样本的可接受性与青少年认为临床医生知道“如何与像我这样的青少年交谈”(AOR,3.7;95%CI,1.5 - 9.3)以及“在我解释我的担忧时认真倾听”(AOR,3.6;95%CI,1.1 - 11.5)相关。
性病史询问和尿液采集是衣原体筛查的两个关键组成部分,并且在紧急护理环境中绝大多数青少年报告认为是可以接受的。临床医生沟通的各个方面似乎是儿科临床医生教育的重要目标领域,以支持在紧急护理就诊时将衣原体筛查扩展到青少年。