Kharrazi F Daniel, Busfield Benjamin T, Khorshad Daniel S
Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Los Angeles, California 90045, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2007 Aug;23(8):804-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.02.003.
The purpose of this study was to examine the reoperation rate on the acromioclavicular (AC) joint after arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASAD) with and without concomitant AC joint surgery and to identify factors related to continued AC joint symptoms.
We conducted a retrospective review of 1,482 cases without concomitant shoulder pathology that were followed up by physical examination, phone interview, questionnaire, or chart review. Group A, patients who underwent ASAD alone, consisted of 1,091 cases. Group B, patients who underwent ASAD with concomitant AC joint surgery consisting of either co-planing or arthroscopic distal clavicle resection (ADCR), consisted of 391 cases.
A total of 22 patients underwent reoperation on the AC joint. The overall reoperation rate was 1.5%, or 22 of 1,482 patients. The index procedure failed in 16 patients from the ASAD group (group A), yielding a reoperation rate of 1.5%. The index procedure failed in 6 patients from the group undergoing ASAD with concomitant AC joint surgery (group B), for a reoperation rate of 1.5%. Reoperation occurred at a mean of 22 months and 8 months for group A and group B, respectively. Overall, 17 of 22 patients (77%) who required AC joint reoperation were either Workers' Compensation (WC) or litigation cases. The reoperation rate was 2.4% for WC patients and 0.8% for non-WC patients. WC status was found to be a statistically significant factor in the rate of reoperation for AC joint symptoms (P < .05). Of the 22 patients, 10 continued to have pain at a mean of 25.9 months (range, 9 to 53 months) after reoperation. Given the similar rates of reoperation, routine AC joint violation by co-planing or ADCR is not recommended during ASAD. Reoperation for continued AC joint symptoms was associated with a nearly 50% rate of continued symptoms.
The results of the study show that the incidence of reoperation on the AC joint after ASAD with or without concomitant AC joint surgery is small for both groups with a 1.5% rate of reoperation for each group. The incidence of reoperation is lower, at 0.8%, for non-WC cases. In addition, there was a high rate of continued symptoms, with 45% of patients having continued pain after reoperation. Violation of the AC joint during the initial surgery by co-planing or ADCR did not alter the reoperation rate for AC joint symptoms.
Level IV, therapeutic case series.
本研究旨在探讨在进行或未进行肩锁关节(AC)联合手术的情况下,关节镜下肩峰下减压术(ASAD)后肩锁关节的再次手术率,并确定与肩锁关节持续症状相关的因素。
我们对1482例无合并肩部病变的病例进行了回顾性研究,通过体格检查、电话访谈、问卷调查或病历审查进行随访。A组为仅接受ASAD的患者,共1091例。B组为接受ASAD并同时进行肩锁关节手术(包括平面修整或关节镜下锁骨远端切除术(ADCR))的患者,共391例。
共有22例患者接受了肩锁关节再次手术。总体再次手术率为1.5%,即1482例患者中有22例。ASAD组(A组)有16例患者初次手术失败,再次手术率为1.5%。接受ASAD并同时进行肩锁关节手术的组(B组)有6例患者初次手术失败,再次手术率为1.5%。A组和B组再次手术的平均时间分别为22个月和8个月。总体而言,22例需要进行肩锁关节再次手术的患者中有17例(77%)是工伤赔偿(WC)或诉讼案件。WC患者的再次手术率为2.4%,非WC患者为0.8%。发现WC状态是肩锁关节症状再次手术率的一个统计学显著因素(P < 0.05)。22例患者中,10例在再次手术后平均25.9个月(范围9至53个月)仍持续疼痛。鉴于再次手术率相似,不建议在ASAD期间常规进行平面修整或ADCR侵犯肩锁关节。因肩锁关节持续症状进行再次手术的患者中,近50%仍有持续症状。
研究结果表明,无论是否同时进行肩锁关节手术,ASAD后肩锁关节再次手术的发生率在两组中都较低,每组的再次手术率均为1.5%。非WC病例的再次手术率更低,为0.8%。此外,持续症状的发生率较高,45%的患者在再次手术后仍持续疼痛。初次手术时通过平面修整或ADCR侵犯肩锁关节并未改变肩锁关节症状的再次手术率。
IV级,治疗性病例系列。