Van Genderen Eric, Gensemer Robert, Smith Carrie, Santore Robert, Ryan Adam
Parametrix, Inc., Parametrix Environmental Research Laboratory, 33972 Texas St. SW, Albany, OR 97321, USA.
Aquat Toxicol. 2007 Aug 30;84(2):279-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.02.024. Epub 2007 Jun 16.
The goal of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the Biotic Ligand Model to predict Cu toxicity in very hard surface water (>200 mg/L as CaCO(3)), relative to current copper criteria methodologies (hardness-based equation and the water-effect ratio; WER). To test these methods, we conducted acute Cu toxicity tests with three aquatic test species (Ceriodaphnia dubia, Daphnia pulex and Pimephales promelas) in seven surface waters. The sites were representative of effluent-dependent or effluent-dominated streams common to the arid western United States of America (arid West) and a wide range of water quality variables were tested. In addition, concurrent Cu toxicity tests were conducted in laboratory waters that were matched to hardness and alkalinity of the sites to facilitate calculation of WER values. Results were used to characterize empirical relationships between water quality characteristics and Cu toxicity, and to compare measured Cu toxicity with Biotic Ligand Model (BLM) predictions. Acute toxicity tests were also conducted with C. dubia and P. promelas in a range of Ca or Mg-dominated hardness concentrations to determine the independent effects of Ca or Mg on Cu toxicity at high hardness levels. Conclusions from this study suggest that the BLM generates appropriate criteria for the waters tested in this study when compared to the hardness-based equation or WER approach. Although the historical site-specific methods are useful for surface waters with hardness < or = 250 mg/L as CaCO(3), the unique conditions of arid West streams require site-specific methods that account for the influences of critical water quality variables (i.e., pH, dissolved organic carbon, alkalinity, Ca, Mg and Na). Therefore, the BLM offers an improved alternative to the hardness-based and WER approaches, particularly for situations where the current methods would be under-protective of sensitive aquatic life.
本研究的目的是评估生物配体模型相对于当前铜标准方法(基于硬度的方程和水效应比;WER)预测极硬地表水(碳酸钙含量>200mg/L)中铜毒性的可靠性。为了测试这些方法,我们在七种地表水中对三种水生测试物种(杜氏哲水蚤、蚤状溞和黑头呆鱼)进行了急性铜毒性测试。这些地点代表了美国西部干旱地区常见的依赖废水或受废水主导的溪流,并且测试了广泛的水质变量。此外,在与现场硬度和碱度相匹配的实验室水中进行了同步铜毒性测试,以方便计算WER值。结果用于表征水质特征与铜毒性之间的经验关系,并将测得的铜毒性与生物配体模型(BLM)预测结果进行比较。还在一系列以钙或镁为主的硬度浓度下对杜氏哲水蚤和黑头呆鱼进行了急性毒性测试,以确定在高硬度水平下钙或镁对铜毒性的独立影响。本研究的结论表明,与基于硬度的方程或WER方法相比,BLM为该研究中测试的水体生成了合适的标准。尽管历史上特定地点的方法对于碳酸钙硬度≤250mg/L的地表水很有用,但美国西部干旱地区溪流的独特条件需要考虑关键水质变量(即pH值、溶解有机碳、碱度、钙、镁和钠)影响的特定地点方法。因此,BLM为基于硬度的方法和WER方法提供了一种改进的替代方案,特别是在当前方法对敏感水生生物保护不足的情况下。