Lima Filho Roberto M A, Ruellas Antonio C O
Department of Orthodontics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Angle Orthod. 2007 Sep;77(5):870-4. doi: 10.2319/071406-293.1.
To evaluate a 10-year follow-up of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal Class II patients treated with slow and rapid maxillary expansion methods.
The sample consisted of 70 patients divided into two groups: (1) treated with a cervical headgear with expansion of the inner bow (CHG) and (2) using a Haas-type rapid maxillary expansion appliance in conjunction with cervical headgear (RME-CHG). The CHG group consisted of 40 patients (18 males and 22 females; average age 10.6 years at pretreatment [T1], 13.6 years at posttreatment [T2], and 23.6 years at postretention [T3]). The RME-CHG group consisted of 30 patients (14 males and 16 females; average age 10.4 years at T1, 14.0 years at T2, and 24.6 years at T3). The profiles of SNA and SN-PP angles showed no significant differences in either group at T1, T2, and T3 phases.
For the entire sample, the profile analysis between the phases showed reduction in the SNA angle from T1-T2 and an increase from T2-T3. The SN-PP angle showed an increase from T1-T2 and a decrease from T2-T3. Treatment of skeletal Class II patients with slow and rapid maxillary expansions was efficient and stable over the long-term.
The profiles of SNA and SN-PP at T1, T2, and T3 achieved with slow and rapid maxillary expansions were clinically equivalent.
评估采用慢速和快速上颌扩弓方法治疗的骨性II类患者10年的前后向和垂直向上颌变化情况。
样本包括70例患者,分为两组:(1)采用带内弓扩弓的颈牵引矫治器(CHG)治疗;(2)使用哈斯式快速上颌扩弓矫治器联合颈牵引矫治器(RME-CHG)治疗。CHG组有40例患者(18例男性和22例女性;治疗前[T1]平均年龄10.6岁,治疗后[T2]平均年龄13.6岁,保持后[T3]平均年龄23.6岁)。RME-CHG组有30例患者(14例男性和16例女性;T1平均年龄10.4岁,T2平均年龄14.0岁,T3平均年龄24.6岁)。在T1、T2和T3期,两组的SNA角和SN-PP角侧貌均无显著差异。
对于整个样本,各阶段之间的侧貌分析显示,SNA角从T1到T2减小,从T2到T3增大。SN-PP角从T1到T2增大,从T2到T3减小。采用慢速和快速上颌扩弓治疗骨性II类患者长期有效且稳定。
慢速和快速上颌扩弓在T1、T2和T3期所获得的SNA角和SN-PP角侧貌在临床上是等效的。