Thomas Jennifer, Martinez Anthony
Intensive Care Unit, St. Agnes Hospital Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21229, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Aug 15;64(16 Suppl 11):S11-8. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070245.
Anemia of critical illness is common among intensive care unit patients. A blood management pilot program was initiated to study the pharmacodynamic response of epoetin alfa in critically ill patients and assess the impact of the use of a standardized order set of pharmaceuticals, including epoetin alfa and intravenous iron sucrose, on the quantity of red blood cell units transfused in the adult intensive care unit.
A pre-printed order set was developed which included baseline and follow-up laboratory monitoring and pharmaceutical options for iron, either intravenous and/or oral, folic acid, ascorbic acid, cyancobalamin, and weight-based epoietin alfa. Laboratory studies included: hemoglobin/hematocrit, reticulocyte count, absolute reticulocyte count, immature reticulocyte fraction obtained at baseline, and on day three and day five; in addition, iron, total iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation, and ferritin were obtained at baseline and on day five. An average hemoglobin response of 0.8 g/dL five days after administration of epoetin alfa was demonstrated in a diverse population of critically ill patients. Patients who received intravenous iron did not have a difference in mortality as compared to those patients who did not receive intravenous iron; however, there was a significantly longer length of stay. The cost of epoetin alfa was $64,000 over 10 months (approximately 8-10 patients/month). Transfusions of RBCs in adult intensive care unit decreased over the initial five months of the pilot study.
Use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) in the critically ill is controversial. Implementing a standardized approach in the pharmaceutical management of anemia in the critically ill patient is possible. Limitations with the order set and standardized protocol included errors in selection of dose/weight, incomplete laboratory/monitoring, and inconsistent prospective/concurrent review to guide therapy. The determination of the cost-effectiveness of epoetin alfa therapy in anemia of critical illness was not the purpose of this project, but will be the focus of future studies.
危重病性贫血在重症监护病房患者中很常见。启动了一项血液管理试点项目,以研究重组人促红细胞生成素在危重病患者中的药效学反应,并评估使用包括重组人促红细胞生成素和静脉注射蔗糖铁在内的标准化药物医嘱集对成人重症监护病房红细胞输注量的影响。
制定了一份预先印制的医嘱集,其中包括基线和随访实验室监测以及铁剂(静脉注射和/或口服)、叶酸、抗坏血酸、氰钴胺和基于体重的重组人促红细胞生成素的用药选择。实验室研究包括:在基线、第3天和第5天进行血红蛋白/血细胞比容、网织红细胞计数、绝对网织红细胞计数、未成熟网织红细胞比例;此外,在基线和第5天测定铁、总铁结合力、转铁蛋白饱和度和铁蛋白。在不同的危重病患者群体中,重组人促红细胞生成素给药5天后平均血红蛋白反应为0.8g/dL。接受静脉注射铁剂的患者与未接受静脉注射铁剂的患者相比,死亡率没有差异;然而,住院时间明显更长。重组人促红细胞生成素在10个月内的费用为64,000美元(约每月8 - 10名患者)。在试点研究的最初五个月中,成人重症监护病房的红细胞输注量有所减少。
在危重病患者中使用促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESA)存在争议。对危重病患者贫血进行药物管理时采用标准化方法是可行的。医嘱集和标准化方案的局限性包括剂量/体重选择错误、实验室/监测不完整以及指导治疗的前瞻性/同期审查不一致。本项目的目的不是确定重组人促红细胞生成素治疗危重病性贫血的成本效益,但这将是未来研究的重点。