Faber E, Koza V, Vitek A, Mayer J, Sedlacek P, Zak P, Zapletalova J, Benesova K, Krejcova H, Steinerova K, Maresova I, Cetkovsky P
Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Neoplasma. 2007;54(5):443-6.
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT) has been currently recommended in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) as a second option after imatinib failure or in selected group of patients with high-risk CML and low risk for transplant-related mortality. The actual role of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) before AlloSCT in CML patients has not been yet conclusively established. The Czech National Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Registry has conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients (n=29) transplanted after RIC from the Registry database containing 295 patients with CML transplanted in the Czech Republic in years 1988-2005 and compared them with patients at comparable age (median age 48.3 and 50.6 years, respectively; p=0.587) transplanted during the same period of time using conventional myeloablative conditioning (n=26). Survival advantage of patients transplanted after RIC has been confirmed by log rank test (p=0.036) despite the fact that the relapse rate was significantly higher in RIC group (44.8% versus 0%). Both groups did not differ significantly in the use of voluntary unrelated donors, type of the grafts and in incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD). However, there were trends for higher risk of CML and higher use of unrelated donors in the myeloablative group while peripheral stem cell grafts and chronic GVHD were observed more frequently in the RIC group. Transplant-related mortality was the leading cause of death in both groups of patients. Our results should be interpreted with caution because they may be influenced by small groups of subjects and also the impact of patients with high EBMT risk score on inferior survival in the myeloablative group cannot be fully eliminated. More retrospective and prospective studies are needed to elucidate the actual role of RIC before AlloSCT for CML.
异基因干细胞移植(AlloSCT)目前已被推荐用于治疗慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者,作为伊马替尼治疗失败后的二线选择,或用于特定的高风险CML且移植相关死亡率低的患者群体。在CML患者中,异基因干细胞移植前采用减低强度预处理(RIC)的实际作用尚未最终确定。捷克国家造血干细胞移植登记处对登记数据库中所有接受RIC移植的患者(n = 29)进行了回顾性分析,该数据库包含1988 - 2005年在捷克共和国接受移植的295例CML患者,并将他们与同期接受传统清髓性预处理移植的年龄相仿患者(中位年龄分别为48.3岁和50.6岁;p = 0.587)(n = 26)进行比较。尽管RIC组的复发率显著更高(44.8%对0%),但通过对数秩检验证实了RIC移植后患者的生存优势(p = 0.036)。两组在使用志愿非血缘供者、移植物类型和急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)发生率方面无显著差异。然而,清髓组有CML风险更高和使用非血缘供者更多的趋势,而RIC组更频繁观察到外周血干细胞移植物和慢性GVHD。移植相关死亡率是两组患者的主要死亡原因。我们的结果应谨慎解读,因为它们可能受到样本量小的影响,而且清髓组中高EBMT风险评分患者对较差生存的影响也不能完全消除。需要更多的回顾性和前瞻性研究来阐明异基因干细胞移植前RIC对CML的实际作用。