Mishra Peeyush, Desai Nutan, Alexander Jacob, Singh Dharmendra P, Sawant Prabha
Department of Gastroenterology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College, Mumbai, India.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Aug;22(8):1232-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04903.x.
The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), which employs objective variables, statistical weighting and a continuous scale, has replaced the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification as the scoring system of choice in several liver transplant centers. However, the predictive ability of MELD has never been prospectively evaluated in India. The aim of this study was to examine the MELD score, the CTP score and the recently proposed modified CTP score in Indian patients with liver cirrhosis to determine their correlation and compare their prognostic significance for short-term survival.
A total of 76 patients with cirrhosis (mean age 46.97 years) were prospectively evaluated and followed up for 6 months. MELD score, CTP score and modified CTP score were calculated at baseline. The correlation between variables was evaluated by Pearson's correlation test. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the cutoff values for each score with the best sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between patients who survived and those who died.
Alcoholic liver disease was the most common (50%) etiology of cirrhosis. MELD score and CTP score showed very good correlation (Pearson correlation r = 0.983). ROC curve showed area under curve (c-statistics) for MELD score, CTP score and modified CTP score as 0.764, 0.804 and 0.817, respectively.
The MELD score was not found to be superior to CTP score and modified CTP score for short-term prognostication of patients with cirrhosis in this study.
终末期肝病模型(MELD)采用客观变量、统计加权和连续量表,已在多个肝移植中心取代Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)分类,成为首选的评分系统。然而,MELD的预测能力在印度从未进行过前瞻性评估。本研究的目的是在印度肝硬化患者中检验MELD评分、CTP评分和最近提出的改良CTP评分,以确定它们之间的相关性,并比较它们对短期生存的预后意义。
对76例肝硬化患者(平均年龄46.97岁)进行前瞻性评估,并随访6个月。在基线时计算MELD评分、CTP评分和改良CTP评分。通过Pearson相关检验评估变量之间的相关性。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线确定每个评分在区分存活和死亡患者时具有最佳敏感性和特异性的临界值。
酒精性肝病是肝硬化最常见的病因(50%)。MELD评分和CTP评分显示出非常好的相关性(Pearson相关系数r = 0.983)。ROC曲线显示,MELD评分、CTP评分和改良CTP评分的曲线下面积(c统计量)分别为0.764、0.804和0.817。
在本研究中,对于肝硬化患者的短期预后,未发现MELD评分优于CTP评分和改良CTP评分。