Mosley John G
Department of Vascular Surgery, Leigh Infirmary, Leigh, Lancashire, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Jul;89(5):457-63; discussion 464-5. doi: 10.1308/003588407X202209.
The surgical profession, more than any other medical specialty, is constantly in the limelight. Frequently, concerns are expressed about our colleagues. The concerns may be personality clashes rather than failure in behaviour or performance. Most concerns can be addressed locally with support from the Royal College Invited Review Mechanism of the National Clinical Assessment Service. Unfortunately, if the concern is sufficiently serious or repetitive it may warrant referral to the General Medical Council (GMC) who alone has the right to withdraw a surgeon's medical registration. The surgeon will then be unable to work in the medical profession in this country. The procedures the the surgeon must undergo if referred to the GMC are stressful and protracted. Even if successful the surgeon will probably be expected to undergo a period of retraining that will prove difficult to arrange. New proposals to modify the GMC procedures will reduce the standard of proof to one of 'balance of probabilities'. The surgical profession should be accountable to its patients and colleagues. Will our Royal College rise to the challenge to establish itself as the bulwark of the surgical profession?
外科学专业比其他任何医学专科都更经常地处于公众关注的焦点之下。人们常常对我们的同行表示关切。这些关切可能是个性冲突,而非行为或表现方面的失误。在国家临床评估服务机构皇家学院受邀审查机制的支持下,大多数关切都可以在本地得到解决。不幸的是,如果关切足够严重或反复出现,可能就需要提交给英国医学总会(GMC),只有该机构有权吊销外科医生的行医注册资格。届时,这位外科医生将无法在本国从事医疗行业工作。如果被提交给英国医学总会,外科医生必须经历的程序既压力巨大又旷日持久。即便成功,这位外科医生可能仍需接受一段再培训时期,而这将很难安排。修改英国医学总会程序的新提议将把举证标准降至“盖然性权衡”之一。外科学专业应该对其患者和同行负责。我们的皇家学院会迎接挑战,成为外科学专业的堡垒吗?