Alvarez Secord Angeles, Havrilesky Laura J, Bae-Jump Victoria, Chin Jeanette, Calingaert Brian, Bland Amy, Rutledge Teresa L, Berchuck Andrew, Clarke-Pearson Daniel L, Gehrig Paola A
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3079, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Nov;107(2):285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.06.014. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
: The optimal adjuvant therapy for women with stages III and IV endometrial cancer following surgical staging and cytoreductive surgery is controversial. We sought to determine the outcome of patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer treated with postoperative chemotherapy+/-radiation to determine whether there was an advantage to combining treatment modalities.
: A retrospective analysis of patients with surgical stages III and IV endometrial cancer from 1975 to 2006 was conducted at Duke University and the University of North Carolina. Inclusion criteria were comprehensive staging procedure including hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, +/-selective pelvic/aortic lymphadenectomy, surgical debulking, and treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.
: 356 Patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer were identified who received postoperative adjuvant therapies; 48% (n=171) radiotherapy alone, 29% (n=102) chemotherapy alone, 23% (n=83) chemotherapy and radiation. The median age was 66 years; 38% had endometrioid tumors; and 83% were optimally debulked. There was a significant difference between the adjuvant treatment groups for both OS and PFS (p<0.001), with those receiving chemotherapy alone having poorer 3-year OS (33%) and PFS (19%) compared to either radiotherapy alone (70% and 59%) or combination therapy (79% and 62%). After adjusting for stage, age, grade, and debulking status the hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 1.60 (95% CI, 0.88 to 2.89; p=0.122) for chemotherapy alone and 2.01 (95% CI, 1.17 to 3.48; p=0.012) for radiotherapy alone, compared to combination therapy. When the analysis was restricted to optimally debulked patients the adjusted HR for patients who were treated with either chemotherapy or radiation alone indicated a significantly higher risk for disease progression [HR=1.84 (95% CI, 1.03 to 3.27; p=0.038); HR=1.80 (95% CI, 1.10 to 2.95; p=0.020)] and death [HR=2.33 (95% CI, 1.12 to 4.86; p=0.024); HR=2.64 (95% CI, 1.38 to 5.07; p=0.004)], respectively, compared to patients who received combination therapy.
: Combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation was associated with improved survival in patients with advanced stage disease compared to either modality alone. Future clinical trials are needed to prospectively evaluate multi-modality adjuvant therapy in women with advanced staged endometrial cancer to determine the appropriate sequencing and types of chemotherapy and radiation.
对于接受手术分期及肿瘤细胞减灭术的Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期子宫内膜癌女性患者,最佳辅助治疗方案仍存在争议。我们试图确定接受术后化疗±放疗的晚期子宫内膜癌患者的治疗结果,以判断联合治疗方式是否具有优势。
对1975年至2006年在杜克大学和北卡罗来纳大学接受手术分期为Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期子宫内膜癌的患者进行回顾性分析。纳入标准包括全面的分期手术,如子宫切除术、双侧输卵管卵巢切除术、±选择性盆腔/主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术、手术肿瘤减灭术,以及辅助化疗和/或放疗。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型分析无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
共纳入356例接受术后辅助治疗的晚期子宫内膜癌患者;48%(n = 171)仅接受放疗,29%(n = 102)仅接受化疗,23%(n = 83)接受化疗加放疗。中位年龄为66岁;38%为子宫内膜样肿瘤;83%实现了最佳肿瘤减灭。辅助治疗组在OS和PFS方面存在显著差异(p < 0.001),与仅接受放疗(70%和59%)或联合治疗(79%和62%)的患者相比,仅接受化疗的患者3年OS(33%)和PFS(19%)较差。在调整分期、年龄、分级和肿瘤减灭状态后,与联合治疗相比,仅接受化疗的患者OS风险比(HR)为1.60(95%CI,0.88至2.89;p = 0.122),仅接受放疗的患者为2.01(95%CI,1.17至3.48;p = 0.012)。当分析仅限于实现最佳肿瘤减灭的患者时,仅接受化疗或放疗的患者经调整后的HR显示疾病进展风险显著更高[HR = 1.84(95%CI,1.03至3.27;p = 0.038);HR = 1.80(95%CI,1.10至2.95;p = 0.020)],死亡风险分别为[HR = 2.33(95%CI,1.12至4.86;p = 0.024);HR = 2.64(95%CI,1.38至5.07;p = 0.004)],与接受联合治疗的患者相比。
与单独使用任何一种治疗方式相比,辅助化疗联合放疗可提高晚期疾病患者的生存率。未来需要进行临床试验,前瞻性评估晚期子宫内膜癌女性患者的多模式辅助治疗,以确定化疗和放疗的合适顺序及类型。