Stone Nelson N, Potters Louis, Davis Brian J, Ciezki Jay P, Zelefsky Michael J, Roach Mack, Fearn Paul A, Kattan Michael W, Stock Richard G
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Dec 1;69(5):1472-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
To investigate the biochemical control rate in patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy as a function of the biologically effective dose (BED) and risk group.
Six centers provided data on 3,928 permanent brachytherapy patients with postimplant dosimetry results. The mean prostate-specific antigen level was 8.9 ng/mL. (125)I was used in 2,293 (58%), (103)Pd in 1,635, and supplemental external beam radiotherapy in 882 (22.5%) patients. The patients were stratified into low- (n = 2,188), intermediate- (n = 1,188), and high- (n = 552) risk groups and into three BED groups of < 140 Gy (n = 524), 140-200 Gy (n = 2284), and >200 Gy (n = 1,115). Freedom from biochemical disease progression (biochemical freedom from failure [bFFF]) was determined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology and Phoenix definitions and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with factors compared using the log-rank test.
The 10-year prostate-specific antigen bFFF rate for the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology and Phoenix definitions was 79.2% and 70%, respectively. The corresponding bFFF rates for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 84.1% and 78.1%, 76.8% and 63.6%, and 64.4% and 58.2%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The corresponding bFFF rate for the three BED groups was 56.1% and 41.4%, 80% and 77.9%, and 91.1% and 82.9% (p < 0.0001). The corresponding bFFF rate for the low-risk patients by dose group was 69.8% and 49.8%, 86% and 85.2%, and 88.1% and 88.3% for the low-, intermediate, and high-dose group, respectively (p <0.0001). The corresponding bFFF rate for the intermediate-risk patients by dose group was 52.9% and 23.1%, 74.1% and 77.7%, and 94.3% and 88.8% for the low-, intermediate-, and high-dose group, respectively (p < 0.0001). The corresponding bFFF rate for high-risk patients by dose group was 19.2% and 41.7%, 61.8% and 53.2%, and 90% and 69.6% for the low-, intermediate-, and high-dose group, respectively (p < 0.0001).
These data suggest that permanent brachytherapy dose prescriptions can be customized to risk status. In low-risk patients, achieving a BED of >or=140 Gy might be adequate for prostate-specific antigen control. However, high-risk disease might require a BED dose of >or=200 Gy.
研究接受永久性前列腺近距离放射治疗的患者的生化控制率与生物有效剂量(BED)及风险组别的关系。
六个中心提供了3928例接受永久性近距离放射治疗患者的植入后剂量测定结果数据。患者前列腺特异性抗原平均水平为8.9 ng/mL。2293例(58%)患者使用碘-125,1635例使用钯-103,882例(22.5%)患者接受辅助外照射放疗。患者被分为低风险组(n = 2188)、中风险组(n = 1188)和高风险组(n = 552),并分为三个BED组:<140 Gy(n = 524)、140 - 200 Gy(n = 2284)和>200 Gy(n = 1115)。采用美国放射肿瘤学会(ASTRO)和菲尼克斯(Phoenix)定义确定无生化疾病进展(无生化失败[ bFFF]),并使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算,通过对数秩检验比较各因素。
根据美国放射肿瘤学会和菲尼克斯定义,10年的前列腺特异性抗原bFFF率分别为79.2%和70%。低、中、高风险组相应的bFFF率分别为84.1%和78.1%、76.8%和63.6%、64.4%和58.2%(p < 0.0001)。三个BED组相应的bFFF率分别为56.1%和41.4%、80%和77.9%、9