Sanger Terence D, Bastian Amy, Brunstrom Jan, Damiano Diane, Delgado Mauricio, Dure Leon, Gaebler-Spira Deborah, Hoon Alec, Mink Jonathan W, Sherman-Levine Sara, Welty Leah J
Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
J Child Neurol. 2007 May;22(5):530-7. doi: 10.1177/0883073807302601.
Although trihexyphenidyl is used clinically to treat both primary and secondary dystonia in children, limited evidence exists to support its effectiveness, particularly in dystonia secondary to disorders such as cerebral palsy. A prospective, open-label, multicenter pilot trial of high-dose trihexyphenidyl was conducted in 23 children aged 4 to 15 years with cerebral palsy judged to have secondary dystonia impairing function in the dominant upper extremity. All children were given trihexyphenidyl at increasing doses over a 9-week period up to a maximum of 0.75 mg/kg/d. Trihexyphenidyl was subsequently tapered off over the next 5 weeks. Objective motor assessments were performed at baseline, 9 weeks, and 15 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function, tested in the dominant arm. Tolerability and safety were monitored closely throughout the trial. Of the 31 children who agreed to participate in the study, 5 failed to meet entry criteria and 3 withdrew due to nonserious adverse events (chorea, drug rash, and hyperactivity). Three children required a dosage reduction because of nonserious adverse events but continued to participate. The 23 children who completed the study showed a significant improvement in arm function at 15 weeks (P = .045) but not at 9 weeks (P = .985). Post hoc analysis showed that a subgroup (n = 10) with hyperkinetic dystonia (excess involuntary movements) worsened at 9 weeks (P = .04) but subsequently returned to baseline following taper of the medicine. The authors conclude that scientific evidence for the clinical use of trihexyphenidyl in cerebral palsy remains equivocal. Trihexyphenidyl may be a safe and effective for treatment for arm dystonia in some children with cerebral palsy if given sufficient time to respond to the medication. Post hoc analyses based on the type of movement disorder suggested that children with hyperkinetic forms of dystonia may worsen. A larger, randomized prospective trial stratified by the presence or absence of hyperkinetic movements is needed to confirm these results.
虽然临床上使用苯海索治疗儿童原发性和继发性肌张力障碍,但支持其有效性的证据有限,尤其是在继发于诸如脑瘫等疾病的肌张力障碍方面。对23名年龄在4至15岁、患有脑瘫且被判定存在影响优势上肢功能的继发性肌张力障碍的儿童进行了一项高剂量苯海索的前瞻性、开放标签、多中心试验。在9周的时间内,所有儿童均接受剂量递增的苯海索治疗,最大剂量为0.75mg/kg/天。随后在接下来的5周内逐渐减少苯海索剂量。在基线、9周和15周时进行客观运动评估。主要结局指标是在优势手臂上进行测试的墨尔本单侧上肢功能评估。在整个试验过程中密切监测耐受性和安全性。在同意参与研究的31名儿童中,5名未达到入选标准,3名因非严重不良事件(舞蹈症、药疹和多动)退出。3名儿童因非严重不良事件需要减少剂量,但继续参与。完成研究的23名儿童在15周时手臂功能有显著改善(P = 0.045),但在9周时未改善(P = 0.985)。事后分析表明,一个患有运动过多性肌张力障碍(不自主运动过多)的亚组(n = 10)在9周时病情恶化(P = 0.04),但在药物逐渐减量后随后恢复至基线水平。作者得出结论,苯海索在脑瘫临床应用中的科学证据仍然不明确。如果给予足够时间对药物作出反应,苯海索可能对一些脑瘫儿童的手臂肌张力障碍是一种安全有效的治疗方法。基于运动障碍类型的事后分析表明,患有运动过多型肌张力障碍的儿童可能病情会恶化。需要进行一项更大规模的、根据是否存在运动过多性运动进行分层的随机前瞻性试验来证实这些结果。