Suppr超能文献

一种用于评估青光眼药物治疗患者依从性的差距分析方法。

A gap analysis approach to assess patient persistence with glaucoma medication.

作者信息

Lee Paul P, Walt John G, Chiang Tina H, Guckian Angela, Keener John

机构信息

Duke Eye Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;144(4):520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.06.023. Epub 2007 Aug 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop an alternative method for analysis of patient persistence with prescribed medications using the prostaglandin class of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering drugs as a model.

DESIGN

A retrospective study of prescription refill patterns.

METHODS

Patients with a pharmacy claim for a 2.5 ml bottle of latanoprost, travoprost, or bimatoprost between September 1, 2002 and December 31, 2002 were identified from a retail pharmacy database and were followed up for 12 months. Three separate analyses defined gaps in therapy as spans in excess of 45, 60, or 120 days without a refill for the same medication. Patients were categorized by the number of gaps in therapy and the cumulative length of gaps. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted using a 120-day allowable refill period.

RESULTS

For refill periods of 45, 60, and 120 days, 10.6%, 28.6%, and 77.5% of patients, respectively, had no gaps in therapy, and 32.6%, 53.4%, and 86.5%, respectively, had 30 days or fewer off therapy annually. According to the 45-day threshold analysis, 50.7% of patients had three or more gaps vs 18.5% in the 60-day analysis and none in the 120-day analysis. The Kaplan-Meier curve shows 88.6% and 76.1% of patients were persistent for 120 days and one year, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the gap analysis approach may better parallel clinical experience with patient persistence, in which patients stop and restart medications for a variety of reasons over time. This method also may help to identify avenues for investigation of lack of persistency among many patients.

摘要

目的

以前列腺素类降眼压药物为模型,开发一种分析患者遵医嘱用药持续性的替代方法。

设计

一项关于处方 refill 模式的回顾性研究。

方法

从零售药房数据库中识别出在2002年9月1日至2002年12月31日期间有购买2.5毫升瓶装拉坦前列素、曲伏前列素或比马前列素药房记录的患者,并对其进行12个月的随访。三项独立分析将治疗间隙定义为同一种药物超过45天、60天或120天未 refill 的时间段。患者按治疗间隙数量和间隙累计时长进行分类。使用120天的允许 refill 期进行 Kaplan-Meier 分析。

结果

对于45天、60天和120天的 refill 期,分别有10.6%、28.6%和77.5%的患者无治疗间隙,且分别有32.6%、53.4%和86.5%的患者每年停药30天或更少。根据45天阈值分析,50.7%的患者有三个或更多间隙,而60天分析中为18.5%,120天分析中则无。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,分别有88.6%和76.1%的患者持续用药120天和一年。

结论

与 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线相比,间隙分析方法可能更能与患者用药持续性的临床经验相匹配,在临床经验中,患者会因各种原因在一段时间内停药和重新用药。该方法还可能有助于确定许多患者用药持续性不足的调查途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验