Suppr超能文献

羟吗啡酮速释片用于腹部手术后急性疼痛的疗效及耐受性:一项随机、双盲、活性药物与安慰剂对照的平行组试验。

Efficacy and tolerability of oxymorphone immediate release for acute postoperative pain after abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.

作者信息

Aqua Keith, Gimbel Joseph S, Singla Neil, Ma Tina, Ahdieh Harry, Kerwin Rosemary

机构信息

Visions Clinical Research, Palm Springs, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1000-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.001.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients are typically switched from parenteral opioids to oral opioids during the 24 to 48 hours after surgery. In June 2006, an oral immediate-release (IR) tablet formulation of oxymorphone was approved for the treatment of acute moderate to severe pain. Single doses of oxymorphone IR have been reported to provide significant pain relief after orthopedic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of multiple fixed doses of oxymorphone IR in the treatment of acute postoperative pain after abdominal surgery.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in men and women aged >or=18 years undergoing abdominal surgery that required a >or=3-cm incision. Patients who discontinued short-acting parenteral opioids and developed moderate or severe pain (4-point categorical scale [none, mild, moderate, or severe] and pain intensity >or=50 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale [from 0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable]) within 30 hours after abdominal surgery were randomized to receive oxymorphone IR 10 or 20 mg, oxycodone IR 15 mg, or placebo every 4 to 6 hours after the previous dose. The study included 2 efficacy assessments: a single-dose evaluation for up to 6 hours after the dose, and a multipledose evaluation for up to 48 hours after the first dose. Pain was assessed at 15-minute intervals during the hour after the first dose, hourly thereafter for the next 5 hours, and before each subsequent dose. The primary efficacy end point was the median time to study discontinuation for all causes. Assessment of tolerability was based on the proportion of study discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-one patients were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were similar across all groups: 98.8% (327) of patients were women, and 80.1% (265) of the abdominal surgeries were hysterectomies. The mean (SD) age of the study population was 42.6 (9.3) years. The median time to study discontinuation for all causes was significantly longer for all active treatments compared with placebo (oxymorphone IR 10 mg, 17.9 hours; oxymorphone IR 20 mg, 20.3 hours; oxycodone IR 15 mg, 24.1 hours; placebo, 4.8 hours; P < 0.006). Oxymorphone IR 20 mg was significantly more effective than placebo over the 6-hour single-dose evaluation (P < 0.05). With multiple dosing, all active-treatment groups had significantly lower least squares mean current and average pain intensities compared with placebo (P < 0.004 and P < 0.005, respectively). The least squares means of the average pain intensity were significantly lower among patients treated with oxymorphone IR 10 mg, oxymorphone IR 20 mg, or oxycodone IR 15 mg compared with those who received placebo (39.7, 35.2, 39.8, and 50.1, respectively; P < 0.005). Discontinuations due to treatment-emergent AEs did not differ significantly between groups: 8.5% (7/82), 17.3% (14/81), 13.3% (11/83), and 12.9% (11/85) in the oxymorphone IR 10-mg, oxymorphone IR 20-mg, oxycodone IR 15-mg, and placebo groups, respectively. The proportions of patients reporting at least 1 treatment-emergent AE were 46.3% (38/82), 51.9% (42/81), and 54.2% (45/83) in the oxymorphone IR 10-mg, oxymorphone IR 20-mg, and oxycodone IR 15-mg groups, respectively, compared with 34.1% (29/85) in the placebo group (P = NS). The fixed-dose design was a study limitation, as it did not allow titration to effect and thus did not mirror clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

In this predominantly female population undergoing abdominal surgery, oxymorphone IR given every 4 to 6 hours for up to 48 hours provided efficacious and tolerable analgesia for moderate to severe pain.

摘要

背景

患者通常在术后24至48小时内从胃肠外阿片类药物转换为口服阿片类药物。2006年6月,羟吗啡酮口服速释(IR)片剂被批准用于治疗急性中重度疼痛。据报道,单剂量的羟吗啡酮IR在骨科手术后能提供显著的疼痛缓解。

目的

本研究评估了多剂量固定剂量的羟吗啡酮IR治疗腹部手术后急性疼痛的疗效和耐受性。

方法

这是一项多中心、随机、双盲、活性药物和安慰剂对照的平行组研究,研究对象为年龄≥18岁、接受腹部手术且切口≥3cm的男性和女性。在腹部手术后30小时内停用短效胃肠外阿片类药物并出现中度或重度疼痛(4级分类量表[无、轻度、中度或重度],且在100mm视觉模拟量表上疼痛强度≥50mm[从0 = 无疼痛到100 = 难以想象的最严重疼痛])的患者,被随机分组,在每次给药后4至6小时接受10或20mg羟吗啡酮IR、15mg羟考酮IR或安慰剂治疗。该研究包括2项疗效评估:给药后长达6小时的单剂量评估以及首次给药后长达48小时的多剂量评估。在首次给药后的1小时内每隔15分钟评估一次疼痛,此后5小时内每小时评估一次,在随后每次给药前进行评估。主要疗效终点是因各种原因导致研究终止的中位时间。耐受性评估基于因治疗中出现的不良事件(AE)而导致研究终止的比例。

结果

331例患者纳入本研究。所有组的人口统计学特征相似:98.8%(327例)患者为女性,80.1%(265例)的腹部手术为子宫切除术。研究人群的平均(标准差)年龄为42.6(9.3)岁。与安慰剂相比,所有活性治疗组因各种原因导致研究终止的中位时间均显著延长(10mg羟吗啡酮IR为17.9小时;20mg羟吗啡酮IR为20.3小时;15mg羟考酮IR为24.1小时;安慰剂为4.8小时;P < 0.006)。在6小时单剂量评估中,20mg羟吗啡酮IR比安慰剂显著更有效(P < 0.05)。多次给药后,与安慰剂相比,所有活性治疗组的最小二乘均数当前疼痛强度和平均疼痛强度均显著更低(分别为P < 0.004和P < 0.005)。与接受安慰剂的患者相比,接受10mg羟吗啡酮IR、20mg羟吗啡酮IR或15mg羟考酮IR治疗的患者平均疼痛强度的最小二乘均数显著更低(分别为39.7、35.2、39.8和50.1;P < 0.005)。因治疗中出现的AE导致的研究终止率在组间无显著差异:10mg羟吗啡酮IR组、20mg羟吗啡酮IR组、15mg羟考酮IR组和安慰剂组分别为8.5%(7/82)、17.3%(14/81)、13.3%(11/83)和12.9%(11/85)。报告至少1次治疗中出现的AE的患者比例在10mg羟吗啡酮IR组、20mg羟吗啡酮IR组和15mg羟考酮IR组分别为46.3%(38/82)、51.9%(42/81)和54.2%(45/83),而安慰剂组为34.1%(29/85)(P = 无显著性差异)。固定剂量设计是本研究的一个局限性,因为它不允许根据效果进行滴定,因此不能反映临床实践。

结论

在这个以女性为主的接受腹部手术的人群中,每4至6小时给予羟吗啡酮IR长达48小时,可为中度至重度疼痛提供有效且耐受性良好的镇痛效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验