Suppr超能文献

80小时工作周制度下的出院查房:创伤护理从业者的重要性

Discharge rounds in the 80-hour workweek: importance of the trauma nurse practitioner.

作者信息

Haan James M, Dutton Richard P, Willis Michelle, Leone Susan, Kramer Mary E, Scalea Thomas M

机构信息

Department of Trauma/Surgical Critical Care, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2007 Aug;63(2):339-43. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180d0a8a6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Daily multidisciplinary discharge rounds have been shown to decrease length of stay (LOS), increase patient volumes, and virtually eliminates "bypass" (inability to accept admissions). Originally, these were attended by senior house staff from each trauma team. Implementation of the 80-hour workweek precluded house staff participation, raising concerns that these rounds would loss their benefits. Certified nurse practitioners (CRNPs) were added to the trauma teams to assist in patient care and represent the team on discharge rounds, replacing the fellows. We hypothesized that this would offset any potential negative effects.

METHODS

A senior trauma physician leads discharge rounds, focusing on each patient's plan of care. Rounds cover 90 inpatient beds and last approximately 60 minutes. CRNPs from each trauma team, orthopedics, and neurosurgery as well as the teams' discharge planner, hospital bed manager, unit nursing staff, and physical, occupational, and speech therapists participate in discharge rounds.

RESULTS

The results are stratified by time period: June 1998 to May 1999 is before discharge rounds, June 1999 to May 2001 is during the house staff period, and June 2001 to May 2004 is when CRNPs replaced fellows and residents. During the 5-year period, 1999 to 2004, daily discharge rounds maintained their efficacy. We have increased admissions, whereas LOS has remained the same. Admissions of greater than 24 hours have increased, whereas average injury severity score has statistically remained the same. Bypass has virtually been eliminated.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding CRNPs to discharge rounds has allowed us to have the continued benefits of decreased LOS and increased patient volume. Bypass remains rare. CRNPs can effectively replace some house staff functions.

摘要

背景

每日多学科出院查房已被证明可缩短住院时间(LOS)、增加患者数量,并几乎消除“拒收”(无法接收新入院患者的情况)。最初,各创伤团队的高级住院医师参加这些查房。每周80小时工作制度的实施使住院医师无法参与,这引发了对这些查房是否会失去其益处的担忧。创伤团队增加了认证护士从业者(CRNP)以协助患者护理并代表团队参加出院查房,取代了住院医师。我们推测这将抵消任何潜在的负面影响。

方法

由一名资深创伤医师主持出院查房,重点关注每位患者的护理计划。查房覆盖90张住院床位,持续约60分钟。各创伤团队、骨科和神经外科的CRNP以及各团队的出院计划员、医院床位管理员、科室护理人员以及物理治疗师、职业治疗师和言语治疗师都参与出院查房。

结果

结果按时间段分层:1998年6月至1999年5月为出院查房前,1999年6月至2001年5月为住院医师参与期间,2001年6月至2004年5月为CRNP取代住院医师和实习医师期间。在1999年至2004年的5年期间,每日出院查房保持了其有效性。我们增加了入院人数,而住院时间保持不变。住院时间超过24小时的入院人数增加了,而平均损伤严重程度评分在统计学上保持不变。拒收情况几乎已消除。

结论

在出院查房中增加CRNP使我们能够持续受益于缩短的住院时间和增加的患者数量。拒收情况仍然很少见。CRNP可以有效地取代一些住院医师的职能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验