Suppr超能文献

根据肿瘤位置和新辅助放化疗分析直肠癌患者的肛门括约肌保留率

Analysis of anal sphincter preservation rate according to tumor level and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients.

作者信息

Baik Seung Hyuk, Kim Nam Kyu, Lee Kang Young, Sohn Seung Kook, Cho Chang Hwan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seodaemun-ku, C.P.O. Box 8044, 120-752, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Jan;12(1):176-82. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0254-4. Epub 2007 Aug 13.

Abstract

The anal sphincter preservation rate (ASPR) according to tumor level and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherpy (CRT) has not been fully evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the tumor level, neoadjuvant CRT, and the ASPR in rectal cancer patients. We studied 544 patients (tumor level, 0-6 cm) who underwent curative resection for rectal cancer between 1991 and 2005. Patients were divided six into groups according to tumor level over 1-cm intervals, and the ASPR was evaluated in patients with and without neoadjuvant CRT according to tumor level. Sphincter preservation surgery was performed in 191 patients, and 86 patents underwent neoadjuvant CRT. The overall ASPR was 43.0% (37/86) in patients with neoadjuvant CRT and 33.6% (154/458) in patients without neoadjuvant CRT (P=0.094). In an analysis according to tumor level, the ASPR was 0.0 vs 0.0% in <or=1 cm, 0.0 vs 2.1% in 1<or=2 cm (P=0.589), 11.8 vs 16.8% in 2<or=3 cm (P=0.599), 55.6 vs 20.2% in 3<or=4 cm (P=0.001), 57.7 vs 45.9% in 4<or=5 cm (P=0.227), and 66.7 vs 69.5% in 5<or=6 cm (P=0.827). Neoadjuvant CRT did not increase the ASPR in tumor level within <or=6 cm. However, for the tumor level (3<or=4 cm), neoadjuvant CRT significantly increased the ASPR.

摘要

尚未对根据肿瘤位置和新辅助放化疗(CRT)得出的肛门括约肌保留率(ASPR)进行充分评估。因此,本研究的目的是评估直肠癌患者的肿瘤位置、新辅助CRT与ASPR之间的相关性。我们研究了1991年至2005年间接受直肠癌根治性切除术的544例患者(肿瘤位置为0 - 6厘米)。根据肿瘤位置以1厘米的间隔将患者分为六组,并根据肿瘤位置对接受和未接受新辅助CRT的患者的ASPR进行评估。191例患者接受了括约肌保留手术,86例患者接受了新辅助CRT。接受新辅助CRT的患者的总体ASPR为43.0%(37/86),未接受新辅助CRT的患者为33.6%(154/458)(P = 0.094)。根据肿瘤位置进行分析时,在≤1厘米时ASPR为0.0%对0.0%,在1<≤2厘米时为0.0%对2.1%(P = 0.589),在2<≤3厘米时为11.8%对16.8%(P = 0.599),在3<≤4厘米时为- 55.6%对20.2%(P = 0.001),在4<≤5厘米时为57.7%对45.9%(P = 0.227),在5<≤6厘米时为66.7%对69.5%(P = 0.827)。新辅助CRT在肿瘤位置≤6厘米时并未提高ASPR。然而,对于肿瘤位置(3<≤4厘米),新辅助CRT显著提高了ASPR。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验