Suppr超能文献

制备程序对血小板功能测定的影响及抗血小板药物的表观效应。

Influence of preparative procedures on assay of platelet function and apparent effects of antiplatelet agents.

作者信息

Madsen Nathaniel J, Holmes Chris E, Serrano Feliciano A, Sobel Burton E, Schneider David J

机构信息

Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2007 Aug 15;100(4):722-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.091. Epub 2007 Jun 26.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that anticoagulants alter platelet reactivity and the apparent effects of antiplatelet agents. This study was conducted to identify the impact of methods of preparation of blood samples on an assay of platelet function and the effects of antiplatelet agents. The activation of platelets was identified with the use of flow cytometry in response to thrombin (1 and 10 nmol/L), adenosine diphosphate (0.2 and 1 micromol/L), platelet activating factor (1 nmol/L), and convulxin (1 and 10 ng/ml). Antiplatelet effects were assessed after the addition in vitro of tirofiban (50 ng/ml) and cangrelor (10 nmol/L). Results were compared in whole blood and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) anticoagulated with corn trypsin inhibitor (32 microg/ml, a specific inhibitor of factor XIIa). The fraction of young platelets was quantified with thiazole orange, which identifies ribonucleic acid. The activation of platelets was consistently less in PRP compared with whole blood. Activation in PRP was 23 +/- 15% that in whole blood for thrombin, 65 +/- 26% for adenosine diphosphate, 40 +/- 20% for platelet activating factor, and 49 +/- 25% for convulxin (p <0.01 for each comparison). The fraction of young platelets in PRP was 39 +/- 11% that in whole blood (p <0.001). The effects of antiplatelet agents varied with agonist and antiplatelet agent but were generally greater in PRP compared with whole blood (p <0.05). In conclusion, platelet reactivity is lower and the effects of antiplatelet agents are greater and potentially misleading in PRP compared with whole blood. The accuracy of platelet function testing may be improved by performance in whole blood.

摘要

既往研究表明,抗凝剂会改变血小板反应性以及抗血小板药物的表观效应。本研究旨在确定血样制备方法对血小板功能检测及抗血小板药物效应的影响。通过流式细胞术检测血小板对凝血酶(1和10 nmol/L)、二磷酸腺苷(0.2和1 μmol/L)、血小板活化因子(1 nmol/L)和convulxin(1和10 ng/ml)的反应来鉴定血小板的活化情况。体外加入替罗非班(50 ng/ml)和坎格雷洛(10 nmol/L)后评估抗血小板效应。将用玉米胰蛋白酶抑制剂(32 μg/ml,一种XIIa因子的特异性抑制剂)抗凝的全血和富血小板血浆(PRP)中的结果进行比较。用噻唑橙对年轻血小板比例进行定量,噻唑橙可识别核糖核酸。与全血相比,PRP中血小板的活化始终较低。PRP中凝血酶的活化程度为全血中的23±±15%,二磷酸腺苷为65±±26%,血小板活化因子为40±±20%,convulxin为49±±25%(每项比较p<0.01)。PRP中年轻血小板比例为全血中的39±±11%(p<0.001)。抗血小板药物的效应因激动剂和抗血小板药物而异,但与全血相比,在PRP中通常更大(p<0.05)。总之,与全血相比,PRP中血小板反应性较低,抗血小板药物的效应更大且可能产生误导。全血检测可能会提高血小板功能检测的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验