Verlato Roberto, Zanon Francesco, Bertaglia Emanuele, Turrini Pietro, Baccillieri Maria Stella, Baracca Enrico, Bongiorni Maria Grazia, Zampiero Aldo, Zonzin Pietro, Pascotto Pietro, Venturini Diego, Corbucci Giorgio
Cardiology Department, General Hospital, Via P. Cosma 1, 35012 Camposampiero, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2007 Sep;8(9):706-12. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32801105c7.
To evaluate the prevalence of severe right atrial conduction delay in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) and atrial fibrillation (AF) and the effects of pacing in the right atrial appendage (RAA) and in the inter-atrial septum (IAS).
Forty-two patients (15 male, 72 +/- 7 years) underwent electrophysiologic study to measure the difference between the conduction time from RAA to coronary sinus ostium during stimulation at 600 ms and after extrastimulus (DeltaCTos). Patients were classified as group A if DeltaCTos > 60 ms and group B if < 60 ms. Each Group was randomized to RAA/IAS pacing and algorithms ON/OFF.
Fifteen patients (36%, group A) had DeltaCTos = 76 +/- 11 ms and 27 patients (64%, group B) had DeltaCTos = 36 +/- 20 ms. Twenty-two patients were paced at the RAA and 20 at the IAS. During the study, no AF recurrences were reported in 11 of 42 (26%) patients, independently of RAA or IAS pacing. Patients from group A and RAA pacing had 0.79 +/- 0.81 episodes of AF/day during DDD, which increased to 1.52 +/- 1.41 episodes of AF/day during DDDR + Alg (P = 0.046). Those with IAS pacing had 0.5 +/- 0.24 episodes of AF/day during DDD, which decreased to 0.06 +/- 0.08 episodes of AF/day during DDDR + Alg (P = 0.06). In group B, no differences were reported between pacing sites and pacing modes.
Severe right atrial conduction delay is present in one-third of patients with SND and AF: continuous pacing at the IAS is superior to RAA for AF recurrences. In patients without severe conduction delay, no differences between pacing site or mode were observed.
评估窦房结功能障碍(SND)合并心房颤动(AF)患者严重右心房传导延迟的患病率,以及右心耳(RAA)起搏和房间隔(IAS)起搏的效果。
42例患者(男性15例,年龄72±7岁)接受电生理研究,测量在600毫秒刺激时及额外刺激后从RAA到冠状窦口的传导时间差(ΔCTos)。若ΔCTos>60毫秒,则患者归为A组;若<60毫秒,则归为B组。每组随机分为RAA/IAS起搏及算法开启/关闭组。
15例患者(36%,A组)的ΔCTos = 76±11毫秒,27例患者(64%,B组)的ΔCTos = 36±20毫秒。22例患者在RAA起搏,20例在IAS起搏。研究期间,42例患者中有11例(26%)未报告房颤复发,与RAA或IAS起搏无关。A组且RAA起搏的患者在DDD模式下房颤发作频率为0.79±0.81次/天,在DDDR + Alg模式下增至1.52±1.41次/天(P = 0.046)。IAS起搏的患者在DDD模式下房颤发作频率为0.5±0.24次/天,在DDDR + Alg模式下降至0.06±0.08次/天(P = 0.06)。在B组中,起搏部位和起搏模式之间未报告差异。
三分之一的SND合并AF患者存在严重右心房传导延迟:IAS持续起搏在预防房颤复发方面优于RAA起搏。在无严重传导延迟的患者中,未观察到起搏部位或模式之间的差异。