Bleakley Alan, Bligh John
Royal Cornwall Hospital, Institute of Clinical Education, Peninsula Medical School, Plymouth, UK.
Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):79-82. doi: 10.1080/01421590701206780.
Does the tired oppositional debate between student-centredness and teacher-centredness leave the patient stranded, where the patient is surely the focus of a medical education? How might an authentic patient-centred practice be shaped, informed and nourished theoretically? We describe an intellectual landscape of critical, interdisciplinary inquiry that, so far, many medical educators have not inhabited. For example, texts written to inform medical education rarely examine intellectual premises and ideological implications. We offer a number of theoretical frameworks that can inform critical practice, asking 'why do we do it this way?'; 'what are the alternatives?'; and 'how do we justify our approaches intellectually?' We conclude that medical education needs to take stock of its intellectual resources.
以学生为中心和以教师为中心之间疲惫的对立辩论是否会让患者陷入困境,而患者无疑是医学教育的核心?从理论上看,怎样才能塑造、引导并滋养真正以患者为中心的实践?我们描绘了一个批判性跨学科探究的知识版图,然而到目前为止,许多医学教育工作者尚未涉足其中。例如,旨在为医学教育提供信息的文本很少审视知识前提和意识形态影响。我们提供了一些能够为批判性实践提供指导的理论框架,提出诸如“我们为什么要这样做?”“还有哪些替代方法?”以及“我们如何从知识层面为我们的方法辩护?”等问题。我们得出的结论是,医学教育需要评估其知识资源。