Suppr超能文献

计算机辅助乳腺摄影反馈程序(CAMFP)是一种用于继续医学教育的电子工具。

Computer-assisted mammography feedback program (CAMFP) an electronic tool for continuing medical education.

作者信息

Urban Nicole, Longton Gary M, Crowe Andrea D, Drucker Mariann J, Lehman Constance D, Peacock Susan, Lowe Kimberly A, Zeliadt Steve B, Gaul Marcia A

机构信息

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., M2-B230, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2007 Sep;14(9):1036-42. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.05.018.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to develop and evaluate software to support a computer assisted mammography feedback program (CAMFP) to be used for continuing medical education (CME).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five radiologists from our region signed consent to participate in an institutional review board-approved film-reading study. The radiologists primarily assessed digitized mammograms and received feedback in five film interpretation sessions. A bivariate analysis was used to evaluate the joint effects of the training on sensitivity and specificity, and the effects of image quality on reading performance were explored.

RESULTS

Interpretation was influenced by the CAMFP intervention: Sensitivity increased (Delta sensitivity = 0.086, P < .001) and specificity decreased (Delta specificity = -0.057, P = .04). Variability in interpretation among radiologists also decreased after the training sessions (P = .035).

CONCLUSION

The CAMFP intervention improved sensitivity and decreased variability among radiologist's interpretations. Although this improvement was partially offset by decreased specificity, the program is potentially useful as a component of continuing medical education of radiologists. Dissemination via the web may be possible using digital mammography.

摘要

原理与目的

我们的目标是开发并评估一款软件,以支持用于继续医学教育(CME)的计算机辅助乳腺X线摄影反馈程序(CAMFP)。

材料与方法

我们地区的35名放射科医生签署同意书,参与一项经机构审查委员会批准的读片研究。这些放射科医生主要评估数字化乳腺X线照片,并在五次读片解读环节中获得反馈。采用双变量分析来评估培训对敏感度和特异度的联合影响,并探讨图像质量对读片表现的影响。

结果

解读受到CAMFP干预的影响:敏感度增加(敏感度变化量=0.086,P<.001),特异度降低(特异度变化量=-0.057,P=.04)。培训课程后,放射科医生之间解读的变异性也降低了(P=.035)。

结论

CAMFP干预提高了敏感度,并降低了放射科医生解读之间的变异性。尽管这种改善部分被特异度降低所抵消,但该程序作为放射科医生继续医学教育的一个组成部分可能是有用的。使用数字乳腺X线摄影通过网络传播或许可行。

相似文献

2
Impact of an educational intervention designed to reduce unnecessary recall during screening mammography.
Acad Radiol. 2012 Sep;19(9):1114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
4
Using a tailored web-based intervention to set goals to reduce unnecessary recall.
Acad Radiol. 2011 Apr;18(4):495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.11.017. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
5
E-learning tools for education: regulatory aspects, current applications in radiology and future prospects.
Radiol Med. 2008 Feb;113(1):144-57. doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0227-z. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
6
Educational interventions to improve screening mammography interpretation: a randomized controlled trial.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jun;202(6):W586-96. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11147.
7
Online annotation tool for digital mammography.
Acad Radiol. 2004 May;11(5):566-72. doi: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00726-8.
9
[Not Available].
Rofo. 2016 Dec;188(12):1190. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-121659. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
10
Cost-effective teaching of radiology with preclinical anatomy.
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Mar;11(2):196-206. doi: 10.1002/ase.1710. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Enhanced teaching of screening mammography using an electronic format.
Acad Radiol. 2006 Jun;13(6):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.02.052.
2
Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1773-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052911. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
3
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):358-67. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji060.
4
Digital mammography.
Radiology. 2005 Feb;234(2):353-62. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2342030897.
6
Impact studies in continuing education for health professions: update.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003 Summer;23(3):146-56. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340230305.
7
Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Feb 19;95(4):282-90. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.4.282.
10
Effect of variations in operational definitions on performance estimates for screening mammography.
Acad Radiol. 2000 Dec;7(12):1058-68. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(00)80057-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验