Vancaester E, Santens P
Dept. of Neurology, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium.
Acta Neurol Belg. 2007 Jun;107(2):47-50.
Catatonia was first described by Kahlbaum in 1874. Ever since, the concept of catatonia has been the focus of debate, a major point of discussion being its nosological status. The question rises whether it is to be considered a syndrome with a wide variety of causes and clinical signs or a distinct clinical entity. Since catatonia shares a number of symptoms with the neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) and similar treatments can be used in both conditions, it has also been suggested that NMS and catatonia are two variants of the same disorder In this article we describe five cases of catatonia and NMS in order to approach this nosological question. The clinical similarity between both syndromes is demonstrated in our cases. On the level of pathophysiology however, catatonia and NMS are quite different, with catatonia rather being a cortical psychomotor syndrome and NMS a subcortical motor disorder. Similarities can be explained by means of well-known models of basal ganglia function. The nosological problem, however; can only be resolved when the concept of catatonia is better defined.
紧张症由卡尔鲍姆于1874年首次描述。从那时起,紧张症的概念一直是争论的焦点,主要的讨论点是其疾病分类学地位。问题在于它应被视为一种具有多种病因和临床体征的综合征,还是一种独特的临床实体。由于紧张症与抗精神病药物恶性综合征(NMS)有许多共同症状,且两种情况可采用相似的治疗方法,也有人认为NMS和紧张症是同一疾病的两种变体。在本文中,我们描述了5例紧张症和NMS病例,以探讨这个疾病分类学问题。我们的病例显示了两种综合征之间的临床相似性。然而,在病理生理学层面,紧张症和NMS有很大不同,紧张症更像是一种皮质精神运动综合征,而NMS是一种皮质下运动障碍。相似性可以通过著名的基底神经节功能模型来解释。然而,只有当紧张症的概念得到更好的定义时,疾病分类学问题才能得到解决。